The More You Ignore Me Read Online Free PDF Page A

at hand.
    April 27, 2009 6:34PM
    linksys157: So true!
    And if one happens to be “caught” in the act of “personal” quenching? Repeatedly? With whatever is “at hand” (here, we can admit an LOL , can we not?
    YES ! LOL !).
    Well, that personal quenching will be seen as neglecting the communal essence pot (or some such nonsense), and so one will thus be cast out of one’s marriage bed.
    And for what?
    For lack of understanding on the part of the wife regarding what a self-obliterating undertaking marriage is for the husband. And for lack of understanding on the part of the husband that a “wife” is not for bedding in certain manners at all hours, even if she is not, as the case may be, carrying on with the “groom’s closest relation” (Have we said too much?).One will emerge unrecognizable from such a marriage, if one emerges at all.
    April 27, 2009 6:37PM
    linksys181: We are truly coming to a consensus here.
    I thank you, friend!
    But why this pernicious silence from the rest of the Charlico community? Are the community members vexed as to why we reveal these facts to you rather than blithely applaud the menu and the flower arrangements? Simple: I believe Nico (and any other such bridegrooms) should know the truth of their potential “partnerships” if we are ever to have a truly egalitarian society (Yes, community, I am advocating for societal revolution. Does that scare you?
    What of your precious “Obama,” your “Xbox”? You will not need, dears, Obamas or Xboxes in my society. Why?
    What will you do with your time?
    I will answer a question with a question: What is the first requirement of a revolutionary, according to Che Guevara?
    No, not an Xbox.
    It is love, my dears!
    Love! And what kind of love?
    Love of truth, surely! And don’t we all believe we have within ourselves a capacity for love?
    I know I have love to give! Who will dare to take it?
    You?
    Take the challenge, community! TAKE IT !)
    April 27, 2009 6:37PM
    linksys157: I will take it, friend!
    I accept your love of truth, and I will match it with my own truth-love in time (How I love this blog! What a wonderful space in which we can truly, honestly DISCUSS !). What we have revealed is, of course, just one set of facts that should be known by a man (or woman!) when entering into a union. There are more sets. And so you see we are merely providing a service.
    When my revolutionary compatriots and I find a couple clearly unprepared for such tasks (Nico and Charli, in this case), we endeavor to be cruel, yes, but cruel to be kind with our “comments.” Have we grown so sensitive that we can’t stand the truth delivered with such style?
    Surely not! Truth and beauty, my dear!
    Let’s not forget them. I await your response.
    April 28, 2009 2:01AM
    linksys181: I see by your continued silence, dear Emma_1, that we have perhaps gone too far in this initial conversionary tactic and stunned you into (further) dumbness.
    I apologize if my remarks offend your delicate sensibility, but, alas, the truth is not delicate!
    I was not spared.
    DO NOT LOOK AWAY !!!!
    FACE THE TRUTH !!!!!!
    Readers, a blog “encourages” discussion, does it not?
    Without comments, a weblog is merely a monologue, correct?
    And I have, as you can see, discussed.
    I have commented.
    I have put forth my views, my warnings, my style, my beliefs, my visions of the future, and despite the efforts of this wretched Chris Novtalis to block me, I believe we have had a discussion.
    Would it surprise you to know that after the exchange quoted above I received my first “warning” from Chris, the head of his private online neo-Stasi?
    It’s true, and I admit I was less than surprised since I had revealed quite a bit of his plot to the community.
    Oh, it hasn’t always been “me” putting forth my views (linksys181 and linksys157 are just two of the many masks I wear).
    In fact, no