said. âHe certainly does seem toâcrop up.â
ââMany readers of the Times,â â Pam read, ââmust have been shocked, as I was shocked, by its acceptance of the recently published advertisement of the organization calling itself âThe Committee Against Cruelty.â Even in its advertising columns, it seems to me and must seem to many, a newspaper of the stature of the Times owes a responsibility to society as a whole, and is required to consider the public interest.
ââNo one questions the right of Floyd Ackerman, who lists himself as chairman of this âCommittee,â and others associated with him to hold whatever views they wish on vivisection, and to seek to promulgate them. But what they are doing in this advertisement is, in effect, crying âFire!â in a crowded theater. It is there, as one of our most distinguished jurists long ago pointed out, that the right of free speech ends.
ââI refer, of course, to the advertisementâs disparaging references to the value of the vaccine which has already done so much to curb infantile paralysis, and this at a time when health authorities are bending every effort to bring about universal inoculation. And this because the development of the vaccine has cost the lives of many monkeys! It is difficult to believe that sentimentality has ever been carried to more dangerous lengths, and that the Times has abetted an attitude so essentially immoral.
ââI cannot, I think, be accused of indifference to animal sufferings. Rather notoriously, I am addicted to cats, and have written a good deal about them. I am a member of several organizations which seek more humane treatment of all our animal friends. But I cannot understand anyone who sets the life of a monkeyâyes, or even the life of a catâabove that of a child. I am rather glad I canât.ââ
Pam stopped, looked up and awaited comment.
âA little heavy-handed,â Jerry said, speaking as an editor. âBut rather a nice sting in the tail, I think. Ackermanâll be boiling, if I know Ackerman.â
âAll right,â Pam said, after blinking twice, âdo you know Ackerman?â
âOddly enough,â Jerry said. âHe brought us a book a while back. âCriminals in White Coats,â he wanted to call it. Very upset when we said we guessed not. If youâre through with the sports section, Iâd like to see what Danzigââ
âIn due time,â Pam said. âAckerman first.â
âWhy?â
âBecause,â Pam said, âall at once everythingâs full of Mr. Blanchard. Iâm beginning to have feelings.â
âNot that!â Jerry said. âBut, all right. About Ackermanââ
Ackerman had come, in person, to the offices of North Books, Inc., several months beforeâsome time, as Jerry recalled it, in late June. He had come bearing manuscript, a thing which happens even to the best of publishers. He had beenâit was to be assumed he still wasâa pale and intense man in his middle forties; a very thin man; a man who wore large glasses and, when excited, trembled. He was already excited when, after subterfuge had been exhausted, he was admitted to Jerryâs office. He put the manuscript on Jerryâs desk and stood on the other side of the desk, shaking with fervor.
âWe get all kinds,â Jerry told Pam, with resignation. âAckerman was a bitâexcessive. So damned excessive heâs a splinter group more or less by himself.â
He had, for one thing, suggested that he, then and there, read the book aloud to Gerald North. Jerry had pleaded the pressure of other duties. Ackerman had, then, offered to read sections. He had begun to untie the manuscriptâit was loose-paged, and bound with stringâand, it seemed to Jerry, his eyes had begun to glitter behind the large glasses.
âFanatics are one
Raynesha Pittman, Brandie Randolph