you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?â The officer rattled it off like it was one multisyllable word.
âI do,â Peyton said.
Haviland advanced. âOfficer Peyton, what is your profession?â
âIâm an officer for the Media Police Department.â
âHow many years have you been a police officer?â
âEight years, give or take.â
Next to me, Terry Sheppard slouched, apparently bored with the witness, and played with the end of his mustache. I figured it was a pose, meant to communicate to the jury a contempt for the witness, but I wasnât sure. He did this all the time. He might actually be bored.
âDo you remember where you were the evening of December second?â Haviland asked.
âYes, I do. I was cruising the downtown Media area when I got a call from the dispatcher to Woodview Lane, possible armed assault,â Peyton said.
âAnd you went to the scene as ordered?â
âYes, I did.â
âWere you the only one there?â
âNo, my partner, Officer Jimenez, was in the car with me, also Officers Esposito and Ashford arrived on the scene in their car approximately five minutes after we did.â
âAnd what did you find when you got there?â
âWe found Mr. and Mrs. Kelley, the owners of the house, along with their three children. Mr. Kelley claimed Brian Vanderhall had discharged a firearm at his wife.â
âWas there evidence of that?â
âYes, sir. There was a bullet hole in the kitchen wall, and a shattered coffee mug with gunshot residue consistent with a firearm discharge about five feet away.â
âAnd can you identify Mr. Kelley? Is he in the courtroom today?â
âSure.â Peyton pointed at me. A lot of people were doing that today. âThatâs him, right there.â
âLet the court records show that the witness identified the defendant, Jacob Kelley,â Haviland said. âThank you, Officer. How did Mr. Kelley seem to you?â
âIâm sorry?â
âHow did he seem to be feeling?â Haviland asked. âWas he happy, sad, angry, annoyed, amused?â
âObjection!â Terry called out. He stressed the first syllable, as if this were the twentieth objection heâd made, and he was growing weary of the prosecutorâs games. âWhat is the relevance of this line of questioning to the murder?â
âIâm trying to establish motive,â Haviland said. This incident occurred the day before, and is crucial for demonstrating the defendantâs state of mind.â
âOverruled,â Judge Roswell said. âYou may answer the question, Officer Peyton.â
âHe was angry,â Peyton said. âBlazing mad. Some guy just took a shot at his wife. Iâd be angry, too.â
âAngry enough to kill?â Haviland asked.
âObjection!â Terry said.
But Haviland waved it away. âI withdraw the question,â he said.
I was having trouble staying in my seat and listening to all this. My muscles kept clenching and unclenching, just like they used to do when I had to sit and listen to a scientist lie through his teeth about the worthlessness of some competing experiment in an attempt to raise the value of his own research. I felt so powerless: unable to explain, unable to speak up or do anything at all. All my life, I had hated that feeling of helplessness and vulnerability. I wasnât sure how I was going to stand it for several days of trial.
âWhat time did you come to the house?â Haviland asked.
âAt 8:25 in the evening.â
âHow can you be certain?â
âThe time was recorded in my report of the incident, which I reviewed before coming here today.â
Haviland reached under the prosecution table and pulled out a giant interactive whiteboard that showed a line with dates and times marked. A rectangle marked