yourself to write me another email. Who are you writing to, in fact? Who do you think of when you think of me (given that, charmingly, you were reminded of me by a thunderstorm)? Do you think of your faceless and bodiless âdreamâ of before, of your âhighest expression of love,â of your âillusion of perfectionâ? Or do you rather think of the shy girl from Café Huber who avoided eye contact? (If I hear from you within four weeks, Iâll go one step further and ask you WHAT precisely you think of when you think of either of the above.)
Much love,
Emmi
Thirty minutes later
Re:
Iâm thinking of the Emmi who, with fingertips so delicate they might vanish into the ether, brushes imaginary strands of hair from her face every thirty seconds and curls them behind her ears, as if she were trying to free her eyes from a veil, finally to see things as sharply and clearly as she has been describing them for ages. And I ask myself time and again whether this woman is truly happy in her life.
Ten minutes later
Re:
Dear Leo,
If I were to get an email like that each day, Iâd be the happiest woman in the world.
Three minutes later
Re:
Thank you, Emmi. But Iâm sorry to say that happiness is not made of emails.
One minute later
Re:
Then what? What is happiness made of? Please tell me, Iâm bursting to know!!!
Five minutes later
Re:
Out of security, trust, things in common, care, experiences, inspiration, ideas, beliefs, challenges, goals. And Iâm sure this list is incomplete.
Three minutes later
Re:
Yikes! That sounds like a nightmare, like some kind of modern-day decathlon, entire weeks of activities around the theme of happiness, with an exhibition of its underlying virtues and features. Iâd rather get a daily email from Leo, with a small, imaginary lock of hair. Have a lovely evening! Glad youâve not forgotten me.
Kiss on the cheek,
Emmi
The following day
Subject: A question
Dear Leo,
You know what Iâm going to ask now!
Twenty minutes later
Re:
Your determined use of the exclamation mark gives me a pretty good idea.
One minute later
Re:
So, what am I going to ask you then?
Three minutes later
Re:
âHow was London?â
One minute later
Re:
Oh, Leo, that might be how you would put it. But by now you must know that I like to call things by their names. So: whatâs going on with âPamâ?
Fifty seconds later
Re:
First, âPamâ doesnât need quotation marks. Second, Pam is called Pamela. And third, Pam is not a thing.
Two minutes later
Re:
Do you love her?
Three hours later
Re:
Itâs taking you long enough to think about it.
Ten minutes later
Re:
It may be too soon to talk of that, Emmi, or even to discuss it.
Three minutes later
Re:
Nicely put, Leo. Now I have a choice. Either Leo means: itâs too soon to call it love. Or he means: itâs too soon to talk to Emmi about âPam.â Sorry, Pamela.
Five minutes later
Re:
Definitely the latter, Emmi. The way youâve reverted so quickly to âPamâ tells me that youâre not ready to talk about this. You donât like her, do you? You think sheâs taking your email partner away from you. Am I right?
Five hours later
Subject: (no subject)
Now itâs you whoâs taking your time, my love, trying to find a way to deny it.
Fifteen minutes later
Re:
O.K., youâre right. I donât like her, first of all because I donât know her, so itâs easier for me; second, because Iâm trying my best to imagine her in terms as unfavorable as possible; third, because Iâm managing that quite successfully; and fourth, because, yes, she does take you away from me, the rest of you, the writing bit, the little bit of hope. Hope for ⦠for ⦠who knows what for? Just hope. But I promise you: if you do love her, then Iâll learn to like her. Until then, do you mind if I say âPamâ