for Texas. The latter claim was particularly unlikely, since Houston lost only nine men killed in the twenty-minute battle. And, obviously, both claims could not be true. In fact, Goodwin learned that the great-great-grandfather to whom Johnson referred actually âdied at home, in bed.â When she challenged LBJ he said, âGod damn it, why must all those journalists be such sticklers for details?â
Goodwin explains that Johnson was engaging in the old Texas tradition of the âtall tale.â She quotes a literary historian, Marcus Cunliffe, who wrote that as the âtall taleâ spread west it entered political oratory during an era when politics was among the few sources of entertainment: âWas it true? The question had little meaning. What mattered was the story itself.â
The same notion surfaced again in 2006 when the author James Frey was exposed as having fabricated portions of his supposedly truthful memoir
A Million Little Pieces.
Oprah Winfrey, who had promoted the best-selling book to her devoted audience, at first defended the âunderlying message of redemptionâ in the book, implying that it was acceptable to lie about the small stuff in the service of a laudable goal. But two weeks later she publicly apologized on her own show. âI left the impression that the truth does not matter,â she said. âAnd I am deeply sorry about that, because that is not what I believe.â
Thatâs not what we believe either, and weâd like to see fewer tall tales and more respect for factual accuracy in politics, advertising, and public life in general. Count us among the âsticklersâ who so irritated LBJ. The attitude weâd prefer was shown by the future Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in 1986, when he was a young aide to President Ronald Reagan. Somebody had drafted a joke for Reagan to drop into his annual economic message: âI just turned 75 today, [but thatâs] only 30 degrees Celsius.â That was incorrect: 75 degrees Fahrenheit is only 23.9 degrees on the Celsius scale. Reporters for
The New York Times,
poring over Roberts White House memos during Robertsâs confirmation battle in 2005, found that he had corrected the presidentâs prepared remarks. When Reagan actually delivered them, he said: âI heard a reference to my age this morning. Iâve heard a lot of them recently. I did turn 75 today, but remember, thatâs only 24 Celsius.â
Unprotected Public
How do the deceivers get away with it? Truth-in-advertising laws give some protection from false claims in
commercial
advertising, but a lot still get through. A false ad can run for many months before regulators get it off the air. And even then, advertisers have learned to weasel-word their commercials so that their claims are literally accurate but still misleading. Weâll have more to say about that later in this book. As for politicians, they actually have a legal right to lie in their television and radio ads. There is no federal law requiring truth in political ads at all, and the few states that have attempted such laws have had them overturned or found them ineffective.
Some believe that politicians can be sued for defamation if they stray too far from the truth, and they think that provides some protection to voters. It doesnât. The courts move too slowly for that, and they rightly give candidates the full benefit of the free-speech protections of the U.S. Constitution. So lawsuits for false political claims are rare, and do voters no good. In a classic case from the past, during the 1964 presidential election Barry Goldwater, the Republican candidate, sued
FACT
magazine for claiming he had a severely paranoid personality and was psychologically unfit for the high office. Goldwater won the lawsuit, but the verdict came down long after he had lost the election to Lyndon Johnson in a landslide. So for any who voted against Goldwater
Bill Pronzini, Barry N. Malzberg