dining and living space
to serve as a nightclub for forty. The needs fulfilled by the corner grocery and
local bar in our older neighborhoods are now assumed by 700 cubic-foot re-
frigerators and spacious, walk-in pantries. The resources currently required
to support several million personal outposts cannot be sustained.
54
Densities Too Low
Myths about high-density housing abound. It is widely believed, for example,
that higher population densities necessarily increase congestion and strain
infrastructures. This just simply is not the case. The congestion myth and the
fear it inspires stem largely from some very real conditions that exist in our
everyday world. Wherever a design does not accommodate for the number
of people and the type of activities that occupy it, there will be overcrowding.
But, just as with a house, the solution is not necessarily more space; it is usu-
ally better design.
The goal of design is the same for neighborhoods as it is for houses. Good
community design has to meet our needs without far exceeding them. The
suburbs fail on both these counts. People require open space; while the
‘burbs do offer it on an excessive scale, the space is seldom useful. We
inhabit outdoor space in specific ways, and the gaps left over between build-
ings and roads are seldom sufficient to accommodate our specific activities.
The assumption that arbitrary swatches of pavement and bluegrass can well
serve our outdoor requirements is mistaken. Such uninspired places rarely
get used because they provide no sense of place or purpose.
High-density development is particularly conducive to comfortable outdoor
environments. Providing enclosure without confinement is key. Consider ar-
chitect Ross Chapin’s Third Street Cottages in Langley, Washington. It is a
“pocket neighborhood,” comprised of eight, 975-square foot cottages and a
shared workshop, all encircling a community garden. Eleven parking spaces
have been provided out back. A footpath connects the houses and frames
the common garden at center. A strong sense of enclosure is provided by the
surrounding cottages and reinforced by a low, split-cedar fence separating
55
the tiny private garden of each home from the shared one. This idyllic setting
seems to hug without squeezing too hard. It is twice as dense as zoning nor-
mally allows for the area, and yet, there is not a trace of crowding.
Elfreth’s Alley in Philadelphia offers another example of congestion-free,
high-density development. The community was built before zoning laws were
enacted. Elfreth’s Alley was, in fact, established over 300 years ago and has
been inhabited ever since. At about 20 feet wide with 25-foot-tall houses on
either side, this development falls well within the parameters of the recom-
mended building height-to-road width ratio. It is host to one-way automobile
traffic, the residents of its 38 row houses, and thousands of tourists enjoy-
ing the all-too-rare experience of a place designed for people rather than
cars. On this narrow, cobbled road flanked by brick, stone and foliage, it is
easy to feel at home if only because it all makes perfect sense. There are
no strange codes at work and no inexplicable abyss. It is not crowded, and
it is not sparse. Like Third Street Cottages, Elfreth’s Alley is exactly what it
needs to be and nothing more. In each of these places, thoughtful design
with particular attention to proportion and scale has been employed to make
an environment where serenity and vitality coexist. Each should be a model
for those designers and lawmakers who have a hand in our future.
56
Third Street Cottages on Whidbey Is.
57
Third Street Cottages on Whidbey Is.
58
Elfreth’s Ally in Philadelphia
59
Teaching By Example
Embracing less in a culture founded on the precept of more is counter-cul-
tural, but it need not be self-consciously so. To do what we know to be right
takes effort enough. There is no