petition.
âAnd Giffordâs is?â
âHabeas,â said Isabella. âAnd thatâs good. A direct appeal means that youâve got to stick to issues you can identify from the trial transcript. But in habeas, you can go âextra-record,â meaning, you can go outside the transcript and find evidence or issues that didnât come up during the trial.â
âSuch as?â
âSuch as lots of things. Evidence the police suppressed or mishandled, a witness who wouldnât come forward during the original trial.â
âHave you got any of those?â
âNo,â said Isabella, ânot yet. But we do have one mystery we havenât been able to figure out.â Sheâd leafed through the file again, and pulled out a few sheets fastened together with a red paper clip. âTake a look at this,â she said, âwhen you go through the file. The police canvassed the Plummersâ neighborhood during their investigation, and a neighbor insisted she hadnât seen Travis drop Grace offâwhich would have been nice corroborating evidence, but she did say sheâd noticed two other vehicles at Graceâs late that night.â
âAny details?â
Isabella shook her head. âWe wish. She was unclear about whether it was two cars, a car and a truck, a van, an ice cream truck! Apparently this particular little old lady was the self-appointed neighborhood watch warden. Her husband went to bed early every night, and she was a night owl. So she was constantly peering out her window late at night.â
âDidnât the fact that sheâd seen two other vehicles, parked at Graceâs, whatever they were, support Travisâs theory that someone else could have come byâanother sweetheart, or a burglar orsomething?â
âThat would have been nice,â said Isabella. âBut unfortunately this neighbor, Mrs. Herbert Orson Lomaxâshe referred to herself that way, all three names, every single timeâwas the quintessential elderly lady, with failing eyesight and slightly muddled recall. She was recovering from cataract surgery on the night Grace was murdered.â
âThey pulled a Twelve Angry Men discredit on poor Mrs. Herbert Orson Lomax during the trial,â said Eleanor.
âGot it,â I said, thinking of the Henry Fonda classic in which the busybody neighbor who insisted sheâd seen the wrongly accused young man neglected to mention that sheâd spied the crime at the exact moment an El train rumbled past, obscuring her view.
âStill, I guess your investigator is going back to talk to her again.â
âAgain, I wish,â said Isabella. âMrs. Lomax has gone to her reward since the trial.â
âWhat about all the new DNA evidence?â I asked. âI heard Barry Scheckâthe guy from the OJ criminal trialâon the news the other day, flogging his book about stuff like that.â
âThatâs an exciting emerging area,â said Eleanor. âItâs one reason they reopened the Sam Sheppard case after all these years. And that may be something Isabella can pursue. But right now, the DNA evidence is hurting her case. Itâs Giffordâs DNA that was all over Mrs. Plummer. We donât know yet if thereâs any other angle to pursue.â Eleanor and Isabella exchanged a quick look. Neither said anything.
âOkay, so what next?â
âNow,â said Isabella, âweâre in the process of writing a brief and investigating the habeas. Itâs on a killer deadline. Because once we file our AOBâthatâs an appellantâs opening briefâand the state responds, we file a reply brief, and then the habeas petition is due in 180 days. If we miss the deadline, the issues that are in the habeas petition are lost forever. No one can ever raise them again.â
âWhat arenât you telling me?â I asked.
âLots,â