words and answered pat and to the point. You couldnât have told, listening to her, which side she was on. Got all her wits about her, she had.The brisk kind.â He paused. âKnew a lot more than she ever let on about the whole thing, I shouldnât wonder.â
âI, too, should not wonder,â said Hercule Poirot.
He looked sharply at the wrinkled, shrewd face of Mr. Alfred Edmunds. It was quite bland and impassive. But Hercule Poirot wondered if he had been vouchsafed a hint.
Four
T HE O LD S OLICITOR
M r. Caleb Jonathan lived in Essex. After a courteous exchange of letters, Poirot received an invitation, almost royal in its character, to dine and sleep. The old gentleman was decidedly a character. After the insipidity of young George Mayhew, Mr. Jonathan was like a glass of his own vintage port.
He had his own methods of approach to a subject, and it was not until well on towards midnight, when sipping a glass of fragrant old brandy, that Mr. Jonathan really unbent. In oriental fashion he had appreciated Hercule Poirotâs courteous refusal to rush him in any way. Now, in his own good time, he was willing to elaborate the theme of the Crale family.
âOur firm, of course, has known many generations of the Crales. I knew Amyas Crale and his father, Richard Crale, and I can remember Enoch Craleâthe grandfather. Country squires, all of them, thought more of horses than human beings. They rode straight, liked women, and had no truck with ideas. They distrusted ideas. But Richard Craleâs wife was cram full of ideasâmore ideasthan sense. She was poetical and musicalâshe played the harp, you know. She enjoyed poor health and looked very picturesque on her sofa. She was an admirer of Kingsley. Thatâs why she called her son Amyas. His father scoffed at the nameâbut he gave in.
âAmyas Crale profited by his mixed inheritance. He got his artistic trend from his weakly mother, and his driving power and ruthless egoism from his father. All the Crales were egoists. They never by any chance saw any point of view but their own.â
Tapping with a delicate finger on the arm of his chair, the old man shot a shrewd glance at Poirot.
âCorrect me if I am wrong, Mr. Poirot, but I think you are interested inâcharacter, shall we say?â
Poirot replied.
âThat, to me, is the principal interest of all my cases.â
âI can conceive of it. To get under the skin, as it were, of your criminal. How interesting. How absorbing. Our firm, of course, have never had a criminal practice. We should not have been competent to act for Mrs. Crale, even if taste had allowed. Mayhews, however, were a very adequate firm. They briefed Depleachâthey didnât perhaps show much imagination thereâstill, he was very expensive and, of course, exceedingly dramatic! What they hadnât the wits to see was that Caroline would never play up in the way he wanted her to. She wasnât a dramatic woman.â
âWhat was she?â asked Poirot. âIt is that that I am chiefly anxious to know.â
âYes, yesâof course. How did she come to do what she did? That is the really vital question. I knew her, you know, before she married. Caroline Spalding, she was. A turbulent unhappy creature. Very alive. Her mother was left a widow early in life andCaroline was devoted to her mother. Then the mother married againâthere was another child. Yesâyes, very sad, very painful. These young, ardent, adolescent jealousies.â
âShe was jealous?â
âPassionately so. There was a regrettable incident. Poor child, she blamed herself bitterly afterwards. But you know, Mr. Poirot, these things happen. There is an inability to put on the brakes. It comesâit comes with maturity.â
Poirot said:
âWhat happened?â
âShe struck the childâthe babyâflung a paperweight at her. The child lost the sight of one eye and