ethic that persisted even at the expense of her self-respect (like when he tries to flatter Vera Miles in Liberty Valance by saying âYou sure are cute when youâre angry,â a line that became a yardstick of macho insensitivity). Presley had no such qualms. What you hear in Presleyâs recording of âThatâs All Rightâ is a young man unleashing every impulse his father held in check. Thereâs hardly a sound in the recording that isnât ecstaticâitâs a young man sensing a bigger world for perhaps the first time, and letting that exuberance lift and carry him toward what he wants. This new style of manliness was far more than just the Saturday-night hillbilly kicking down the door of Sunday-morning respectability; itâs a teenager at the peak of his physical powers getting his first taste of freedomâof sex, of self-determinationâand gunning it. It kicked off what Greil Marcus called âthe heyday of Sun Records and rockabilly music, a moment when boys were men and men were boys.â
Perhaps because âThatâs All Rightâ was such a disruption, a joyride that targeted prevailing ideas about âmanhoodâ to their core, the next few songs Elvis cut were ballads, reassuring consolations like âI Love You Because,â âHarbor Lights,â âBlue Moon,â âTomorrow Nightâ (the male precursor to the Shirellesâ âWill You Love Me Tomorrowâ), and âIâll Never Let You Go (Little Darlinâ).â Here was an outpouring of feeling John Wayne would never catch sight of from the corner of his eye.
Frank Sinatra pitched woo with knowing sentimentality, but his songs and delivery all hewed to Tin Pan Alleyâs version of Wayneâs code. Urbane, witty, and unflappable, Sinatra hung on to his mike stand as though it gave him strength, and wooed women with enough restraint and finesse to make up for his skinny physique. With Sinatra, vulnerability was acceptable inside a song, as long as that was the only place it got expressed. Presley, on the other hand, made openly falling apart for a woman seem attractive, enviable, even worthwhile. Who could refuse the man who sang âHeartbreak Hotelâ as though a womanâs rebuff meant a life sentence of misery, where loneliness equaled death? The very idea that a woman could drive him to such heights and depths was proof that these emotions were worth feeling. Where Sinatra kept a gentlemanâs check on his emotingâand kept it in the service of the musicâPresley wallowed in it. Moreover, it would never have occurred to Sinatra to turn his own body into a sex object; the sex was all in the song. Elvis took what women wanted to hear furtherâthe sound of a man doubled over with feelingâand redefined it as cool for all the men in his audience. This, too, was all in the service of the rhythm and blues he sang.
*Â Â Â *Â Â Â *
Presleyâs films are numerous and, sadly, ludicrous. But he worked out his persona through his singing, and the show-business industry couldnât emasculate him nearly as much through recordings as they did on film. Presleyâs vocal agility became analogous to Wayneâs physical control. A lot of listeners cower at the way Presley played the romantic wimp, but his sentimentality was really just another strand of how he rewired manhood: why not get on your knees and plead to a woman, if that would make the difference? And if women liked the scatting and riffing just as much, what were Presleyâs aching tremolo and swooping low register good for if not some slurpy ballads? Where Wayne played romantic scenes with diffidence, as if antsy for the more heroic encounters with other men, Presley gave romanticism a rockabilly foolâs glint. You could hear the self-consciousness in the musicâwith lines this drawn out, this exuberantly extended, his romantic pitches were full of