a gun,â Whitcomb said. âThatâs the end result, but not the order they came to us.â She opened a laptop on her cluttered desk. âHereâs my time line. On the twenty-fourth, we receive a body, petite Caucasian female, blond/blue, a well-kept Jane Doeâprobably not a runaway. Her face is marked up with undarkened contusions. Nice clothes but no other personal effects. Two bullet wounds. One wound is ragged. The other is entry only. We work the body up as a homicide. At the scene, we find a small amount of blood. The body mayâve been dumped.â
Vasquez scowled at Guthrie, thinking, the drunk vagrant is three for three already.
âSomething to share with the class?â Whitcomb asked. âNo? Okay, on the twenty-fifth we have a provisional ID. Our Jane Doe may be Camille Bowman, a missing Columbia student. We confirm by one P.M. and move on to the ballistics. One bullet is battered; it entered the body and passed through, struck the ground, bounced, and reentered the body. That sequence explains the wound channel and the condition of the bullet. Trace from the scene entered the wound channelâshe was shot in situ. Minor blood pooling under the body indicates the bullet was fired from above the prone body. That particular bullet pierced the heart twice, but it still wasnât the fatal shot. The first shot killed her, and prevented bleeding. That bullet entered at the base of the neck on a plunging trajectory. The wound channel stopped at the diaphragm. We recovered a pristine bullet. Two bulletsâone smashed and one clean, both forty-four caliber. This was a small woman. The forty-four was massive overkill. Her blood alcohol was point oh-two. No other chemicals.â
âWhat about the beating?â Guthrie asked.
âSome argument about that, but no disagreement that it was only a few blows shortly before TOD. Slapping or punching, no indication of a weapon. The contusions are too diffuse for a weaponâno edges or lines. This happened ten or twenty minutes before TOD.â She drew a long breath. âNegativesâno ligature marks, so she was never restrained. No sexual assault apparent. The only thing disturbed was her pocketsâcould be a robbery motive, that being speculation, but it was evident that something was removed from her possession.â
Whitcomb sighed and tapped keys on her laptop. âSo, a few days, no significant trace, but we have a bullet. Early on the thirtieth, we receive a gun by warrant, a forty-four Smith & Wesson Chiefâs Special five-shot, recently fired. We trace ballistics. The weapon is a perfect match for our clean bullet. We have the gun that fired the bulletââ She studied Vasquez. âYou need some water? You look like youâre choking.â
The vagrant witness was four for four; the pistol was tiny. Vasquez knew because she carried the same pistol in .40 caliber. Guthrie glared at her, but it was too late.
âWhat the hell is going on?â Whitcomb demanded. âThis is some sort of circus? Tommy?â
âGuth, what the hell?â the young man asked.
âSome people will be looking at this,â Guthrie said. âYou already knew that when you pushed the first ballistics test up the list, right?â
Whitcomb slid Tommy Johnson a sharp glance. âI guess weâre done here,â she said. âWalk them out, Tommy; then come back up here.â
The elevator ride down was silent. Several times, Guthrie or Tommy Johnson started to speak but subsided before words broke out. Vasquez studied their reflections in the brushed stainless-steel elevator door. The two men were made from the same mold; even the way they held their heads when they brooded was similar. Vasquez kept quiet because she knew sheâd screwed up. She had been excited. The NYPD didnât need to know they had something to work from, because they werenât on the same team. While the elevator