exponentially. As sug-
gested above, this volume both in number of contributors and in its shear
size represents a watershed in this process. It allows us to drink in the vast
range of interest and potentially useful applications of mindfulness in the dis-
ciplines of psychology, psychiatry, and psychotherapy and the breadth and
depth in the quality of the work and the thought and effort behind it.
The book itself will also very likely serve as a catalyst to amplify even
further the phenomenon depicted in Figure 1, as it both legitimates aca-
demic and scholarly interest and invites students and young investigators and
clinicians to consider whether this emerging exploration of mindfulness res-
onates in some deep way with their calling in both professional and personal
xxviii
Foreword
terms. My hope is that it will also germinate a whole new generation of
research investigations that bring together the emerging fields of what is now
being called contemplative neuroscience or neuro-phenomenology on both
the cognitive and affective sides, with practical high-quality mindfulness-
based clinical applications that may be of benefit to large numbers of people
who are experiencing pain and suffering in their lives, both from outright
illness and disease, and also from what could be termed “dis-ease,” the stress
and intrinsic unsatisfactoriness of a life that is always seeking some other
state or condition in which to feel fulfilled, complete, and happy – what the
Buddha was pointing to in his articulation of the first of the four noble truths:
in the Pali language, the actuality of dukkha [5].
Interestingly, the Four Noble Truths were articulated by the Buddha in a
medical framework, beginning with a specific diagnosis, dukkha itself: then
a clearly stated etiology, that the dis-ease or dukkha has a specific cause,
namely craving: a salutary prognosis, namely the possibility of a cure of the
dis-ease through what he called cessation: and fourth, a practical treatment
plan for bringing about liberation from suffering, termed The Noble Eightfold
Path . This is all recounted in Chapters 1 [Siegel, Germer, and Olendzky] and
Chapter 2 [Olendzky], where it is made abundantly clear that right or wise
mindfulness is one but only one of the eight path factors. However, as a
number of authors here and elsewhere point out, the term mindfulness (in
Pali, sati ) has a range of different meanings that are hotly debated to this day
among Buddhist scholars, and even among scholars who share specializing
in a particular Buddhist tradition.
Perhaps it is important to state explicitly at this point that in my own
work and that of my colleagues in the Center for Mindfulness, from the very
beginning we have consciously used the term mindfulness in several com-
plementary ways: one, as an operationally defined regulation of attention
(see below); and two, as an umbrella term that subsumes all of the other
elements of the Eightfold Noble Path, and indeed, of the dharma itself, at
least in implicit form. We never limit our use of mindfulness to its most nar-
row technical sense of whether the attention is or is not fully on the chosen
object of one’s attention in any given moment. As noted, there is a consider-
able range of definitions of mindfulness even among Buddhist scholars who
specialize in the subject. I offered an operational definition for the sake of
clarifying what we mean when we speak of cultivating mindfulness through
both formal and informal meditative practices, namely, the awareness that
arises through paying attention on purpose in the present moment, non-
judgmentally. It was meant to be just that – an operational definition. This
approach leaves the full dimensionality and impact of mindfulness or mind-
ful awareness implicit and available for ongoing inquiry and investigation,
and indeed, it has recently become the subject of much interest and inquiry,
in the many