Their working title was The Airstream Futuropolis: The Tomorrow That Never Was .
Thereâs a British obsession with the more baroque elements of American pop culture, something like the weird cowboys-and-Indians fetish of the West Germans or the aberrant French hunger for old Jerry Lewis films. In Dialta Downes this manifested itself in a mania for a uniquely American form of architecture that most Americans are scarcely aware of. At first I wasnât sure what she was talking about, but gradually it began to dawn on me. I found myself remembering Sunday morning television in the Fifties.
Sometimes theyâd run old eroded newsreels as filler on the local station. Youâd sit there with a peanut butter sandwich and a glass of milk, and a static-ridden Hollywood baritone would tell you that there was A Flying Car in Your Future. And three Detroit engineers would putter around with this big old Nash with wings, and youâd see it rumbling furiously down some deserted Michigan runway. You never actually saw it take off, but it flew away to Dialta Downeâs never-never land, true home of a generation of completely uninhibited technophiles. She was talking about those odds and ends of âfuturisticâ Thirties and Forties architecture you pass daily in American cities without noticing: the movie marquees ribbed to radiatesome mysterious energy, the dime stores faced with fluted aluminum, the chrome-tube chairs gathering dust in the lobbies of transient hotels. She saw these things as segments of a dreamworld, abandoned in the uncaring present; she wanted me to photograph them for her.
The Thirties had seen the first generation of American industrial designers; until the Thirties, all pencil sharpeners had looked like pencil sharpeners â your basic Victorian mechanism, perhaps with a curlicue of decorative trim. After the advent of the designers, some pencil sharpeners looked as though theyâd been put together in wind tunnels. For the most part, the change was only skin-deep; under the streamlined chrome shell, youâd find the same Victorian mechanism. Which made a certain kind of sense, because the most successful American designers had been recruited from the ranks of Broadway theater designers. It was all a stage set, a series of elaborate props for playing at living in the future.
Over coffee, Cohen produced a fat manila envelope full of glossies. I saw the winged statues that guard the Hoover Dam, forty-foot concrete hood ornaments leaning steadfastly into an imaginary hurricane. I saw a dozen shots of Frank Lloyd Wrightâs Johnsonâs Wax Building, juxtaposed with the covers of old Amazing Stories pulps, by an artist named Frank R. Paul; the employees of Johnsonâs Wax must have felt as though they were walking into one of Paulâs spray-paint pulp Utopias. Wrightâs building looked as though it had been designed for people who wore white togas and Lucite sandals. I hesitated over one sketch of a particularly grandiose prop-driven airliner, all wing, like a fat symmetrical boomerang with windows in unlikely places. Labeled arrows indicated the locations of the grand ballroom and two squash courts. It was dated 1936.
âThis thing couldnât have flownâ¦?â I looked at Dialta Downes.
âOh, no, quite impossible, even with those twelve giant props; but they loved the look, donât you see? New York to London in less than two days, first-class dining rooms, private cabins, sun decks, dancing to jazz in the eveningâ¦The designers were populists, you see; they were trying to give the public what it wanted. What the public wanted was the future.â
Iâd been in Burbank for three days, trying to suffuse a really dull-looking rocker with charisma, when I got the package from Cohen. It is possible to photograph what isnât there; itâs damned hard to do, and consequently a very marketable talent. While Iâm not bad at it, Iâm
Eleanor Coerr, Ronald Himler