concern. It was a question of
time
.
âDave Bresnahan, this is John Wright. Iâm calling from the Denver office. And Iâd like to talk about the traverse project. Is this a good time?â
âIâve been expecting your call.â Dave was the operations and logistics officer for the U.S. Antarctic Program. He was NSFâs sponsor for the project.
âDave, Iâve been here a week going over reports and gauging the support I might get. Iâm happy to find high quality in Evansâs legacy documentsââ
âYou should see the smile on my face to hear you say that, John.â
Dave might have sat in a cubicle like mine, in some endlessly bigger government office, but he sounded comfortable. Perhaps he sat at a deluxe executive desk in its own room. With a door. When the SPIT project lost its funding, Dave had instructed Evans to leave a record that the next person could start right in on. âVery happy indeed to hear your opinion. We had no idea how long itâd be, or even if weâd start up again. And if thereâs ever another hiatus in the project, Iâll want you to leave the same kind of trail.â
âIf I take the job, I will. But we need a reckoning about that. This is not a three-year job. I read the draft proposals while I was at Pole. And I wrote back that it was a five-year job at a sane pace, a four-year job with luck. Now that Iâm in the office, I find the project is slated for three years. We donât know the terrain, and we do not know what kind of tractors or sleds will work on it. Three years assumes we know everything at the outset, and that ainât so.â
Daveâs voice became less familiar, less friendly. âWeâre going to fund the project incrementally. Weâll take stock of lessons learned each season and fund the next step. And weâll hope to get the concept proved in three years.â
Dave had advanced the cause in little steps for more than one decade. And he was passionate about the project. But three years was not entirely a matter ofreckless bravado; it was a matter of what he could sell. A longer project would not have sold in the upper echelons at NSF. The contractor wrote what Dave told them to. As for me, the nature of my employment through the support contractor would not be full time, rather individual contract employment from one six-month period to the next. The incremental project funding Dave described offered no promise for the project duration.
âThree years is too fast,â I declared.
âYou let me worry about that,â he said. âYou are the right man for the job. Call any time, with any concern you may have. And keep me informed.â
âIf I take the job, I will.â We hung up.
Even with the promise of support from NSFâs sponsor, pay-go was vulnerable to a three-year pass-fail. On the flip side, the support contractorâs cost-plus contract held no incentive for project success, only for its duration and the total dollars spent on it. Where were my allies? Iâd just hung up the phone with one.
The footpath winding around the Denver office park, where the contractorâs huge building was only one of many, followed a drainage stream that babbled over artfully placed rocks in a manicured streambed. The sun overhead warmed the crisp, spring air. I strolled alone.
A years-old conversation with a mechanic in the McMurdo shop came to mind. My traverse partner and I had managed a field fix on our fifteen-ton Delta truck on the frozen waters of McMurdo Sound. With radio support from the shop, we completed our delivery to Marble Point, and we drove our vehicles back to town.
There I met the mechanic foreman in the eight-bay cinderblock âHeavy Shop.â Folks spoke of him with awe, for heâd been in the program a long time and had worked at remote outposts on the continent. He looked like their stories painted him: a shaggy-bearded,