private schoolâwe would get out and walk the rest of the way. Jack motored members of the Bernays family around the city in a Cadillac for many years until the war and gas rationing made a private car impossibleâunless you wanted to trade on the black market, something my parents refused to do. Jack was released from his job. I never knew his last name.
Jack, the Bernaysâ driver, late 1940s.
My parents had no reluctance or even mixed feelings about having money. They never apologized, denied, or even tried to disguise their riches. Whenever my mother needed something made of leatherâhandbag, wallet, passport caseâshe headed for Mark Cross on Fifth Avenue. A dress? Bergdorf Goodman, where the saleslady knew her name and size. A tie for my father? Countess Maraâs shop on Park Avenue, where every tie had impressed on it a medieval tiara. Shoes? Ferragamo. She bought fish at a place on Madison she called âTiffany-by-the-seaâ but was actually Wynn and Treanor. A jewel or two? Cartier, a store both more posh and more personal than Tiffany, where you were apt to bump into tourists and arrivistes. And on and on, always top of the line, the most exclusive, cleanest, quietest, perfume-smelling swishy, and above all designed to make the customer feel desirous and desired.
When my sister and I were very young our mother bought our shoes at Indian Walk on Madison Avenue. They X-rayed your feet to make sure shoes and feet were a match. They gave you a paper Indian chiefâs headdress or a balloon when you left the store
Before heading to a party young girls inserted themselves into party dresses with stiff buckram to make the skirt stick out like a tutu. Before the war, these were light-colored silk or Egyptian cotton with puffed sleeves and a wide belt. During the war you were in danger of growing out of your clothes and not being able to buy replacements as pretty. In any case, a girlâs delicate party dress underscored the prevailing assumption that we were expected to behave like angels-in-training. âSugar and spice and all things niceâthatâs what little girls are made ofââwe heard this with nauseating regularity.
Little boys wore short wool pants, gray or dark blue, a cutoff version of menâs trousers. When they reached a certain ageâaround tenâthey graduated to long pants. This passage was so significantâthe sartorial equivalent of rites of puberty or a bar mitzvahâthat the phrase âheâs still in short pantsâ indicated a stage of emotional growth rather than mere age. Some boys wore woolen knickerbockers, called knickers, a kind of trouser that ended just below the knee in a tight cuff and were also known as âplus fours.â
From the time a girlâs breasts materialized out of tissue that had looked remarkably unpromising for twelve or thirteen years, her waistline took on a superimportance. You belted yourself as tightly as you could without actual pain; I considered the so-called hourglass figure of the 1890s a silly revival. It was especially hard on fat girls, who looked like sausages. If the 1930s were cool and understated, with womenâs dresses beltless and sinewy, often cut on the bias and enclosing their wearers in their own aloof concerns, the 1940s and 1950s required women to flaunt itâbreast, waist, hip, legâas if men needed that extra visual jolt. In most postwar closets there hung a medley of clothes to meet a medley of social requirements, for each of which there were rules, explicit and otherwise. If you didnât abide, you were stared at. My mother added rules of her own: Always wear a slip under a skirt. Never wear black and brown next to each other, or, for that matter, blue and green or red and orange. Why? âThey clash.â Never leave the house without at least one pair of white gloves.
I owned a lot of sweaters and a couple of sweater sets, a short-sleeved pullover
David Stuckler Sanjay Basu
Aiden James, Patrick Burdine