Tags:
United States,
History,
Politics & Social Sciences,
womens studies,
World,
21st Century,
Historical Study & Educational Resources,
Social History,
Americas,
Gay & Gender Studies,
Women in History
credited with kicking off a new publishing genre, âchick lit,â devoted to the stories of women, whom Bridgetâs best friend would, in self-parody, describe as âa pioneer generation daring to refuse to compromise in love and relying on our own economic power.â
As the millennium dawned, it was impossible to watch out for all the women who were coming to change America.
Strange Stirrings
If women slowed their rush to the altar in huge numbers starting in the 1990s, their ability to do so was built directly on political, economic, social, and sexual victories won by the previous generation, during what is commonly known as the Second Wave of the womenâs movement. Several Second Wave feminists would remind me pointedly during my research for this book that my generation had far from invented contemporary habits of marital abstinence or delay; by many measures, theirs had.
And, to some degree, theyâre right: Many women whose consciousness had been raised and opportunities expanded by feminism actively decided, for political and personal reasons, to postpone or forego marriage.
They didnât do so in numbers large enough to create a demographic earthquake, to change the marrying behaviors of the masses, at least not right away. Because while its victories would transform the landscape in ways that would make it far more possible for my generation to delay marriage, the Second Wave was not built on opposition to marriage, but rather a desire to address its suffocating circumstances.
The problem lay buried, unspoken, for many years in the minds of American women. It was a strange stirring, a sense of dissatisfaction, a yearning that women suffered in the middle of the twentieth century in the Unites States. Each suburban wife struggled with it alone. As she made the beds, shopped for groceries, matched slipcovermaterial, ate peanut-butter sandwiches with her children, chauffeured Cub Scouts and Brownies, lay beside her husband at night, she was afraid to ask even of herself the silent question âIs this all?â 9
Is this all? Betty Friedanâs first paragraph sliced the mid-century American situation for middle-class white women to its quick: asserting that the ennui, anger, and unhappiness experienced by millions of American women was the product of the âmillions of wordsâ spilled by experts assuring women that âtheir role was to seek fulfillment as wives and mothers.â These sages had spent a decade and a half, Friedan reported, telling women âhow to catch a man and keep him . . . that truly feminine women do not want careers, higher education, political rightsâthe independence and the opportunities that the old-fashioned feminists fought for.â Those women whoâd been raised with the limited scope of female possibility offered by mid-twentieth century America, Friedan argued, believed that âAll they had to do was devote their lives from earliest girlhood to finding a husband and bearing children.â
The Feminine Mystique would sell 1.4 million copies of its first paperback printing and, though its popularity was likely a symptom of the fact that Friedanâs ideas were already in circulation and gaining steam in other quarters, it would be widely credited as having kicked off the Second Wave. 10 Early marriage and domestic confinement were so pervasive for middle-class white women in the middle of the twentieth century that the nationâs most mass, conscious move to emancipate women erupted directly in response to it.
Yet, funnily enough, as the legal scholar Rachel Moran argues, while the feminist movement of the 1970s was in part a âdirect response to these conditions of early and pervasive marriage,â the ironic side effect was that single women had almost no place in the underpinnings of the movement.
As much as The Feminine Mystique was a cry against the limitations that early marriage and motherhood