of Eden, Wuthering Heights, Jane Eyre . . . âYouâre old enough to stop reading garbage now,â she said. âYouâre old enough for these.â
A Farewell to Arms may have been the first literary novel I loved. Hemingway is accused of machismo, sentimentality, blankness, and misogyny, but I didnât know about any of that then. Nor did I know anything significant about love or death or war, the central concerns of the book. Th e doomed romanceâlike crack to a teenage girlâhooked me, but it was the weird and delicate balance between detachment and intense self-awareness that drew me to the narrator.
I believed everything he said. I thought he talked just the way someone whoâd lived through trauma like that would talk. Th e troops, the mountains, the hills, and the girls were all coolly, precisely observed. And when I got to passages like this, I scrawled them into my notebook: âWe were never lonely and never afraid when we were together. I know that the night is not the same as the day: that all things are different, that the things of the night cannot be explained in the day, because they do not then exist, and the night can be a dreadful time for lonely people once their loneliness has started. But with Catherine there was almost no difference in the night except that it was an even better time. If people bring so much courage to this world the world has to kill them to break them, so of course it kills them. Th e world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry.â
I remember feeling that the book was telling me something about my mother, about who she was without Jesusâlonely and anxious and prone to lying awake in the darknessâand why she felt she needed Him. Reading Hemingway, reading all these novels, made me feel closer to her than actually being with her did. Th ey werenât just fiction, they were artifacts. Th ey showed me who this womanâwhoâd once laughed with me over my storybooks, whoâd stood so awkwardly with the other mothers in the school parking lotâhad been before she became someone who lived for the Lord.
Still, I must have internalized my motherâs discomfort with the bookish part of herselfâand, by extension, her discomfort with the bookish part of me. Until a couple years ago, I secretly viewed fiction and essays as a vaguely shameful hobby. Realizing this, I stopped going out after work. I ceased reviewing. I worked on my novel for hours each day. I even started to tell my mother that I was writing. At first, she changed the subject. Not out of disapproval so much as an unease so deep-seated, so reflexive, she wasnât even aware of it. Her urge to steer the conversation elsewhere was practically Pavlovian. But I persisted, complimenting her storytelling as I did, and eventually she started to dig up old books, Hemingway and Faulkner hardcovers, and send them to me.
It must be a relief to her, knowing where those stories go, finally. And it must have given her pleasureâI know it did meâto learn that we have the same favorite novelist: that religion-obsessed master, Graham Greene.
My Disquieting Muse
JEAN HANFF KORELITZ
In the spring of 1982, I was a twenty-year-old exchange student at Harvard, struggling in a Freud seminar so far over my head that I sometimes wondered whether the class was being conducted in German. In my downtime, I wrote poetry, which Iâd been doing for years. I thought of myself as a poet, but the cold hard truth was that I hadnât read much poetry. Th at is, by poets who were not . . . me.
To my younger self, nothing seemed wrong with that situation. After all, I considered poetry to be all about self-expression, sort of like