We Are the Children of the Stars Read Online Free PDF

carried on by starmen biologists. Later, we will give more attention to this distinct possibility.
    In a book that attempts to present a sweeping and overall picture of what the cosmos is all about, a question is asked: “Granting the truth of Evolution's quantitative development here on earth, what about Evolution's qualitative development – theseperiodical appearances of new genera and new species, or even of new varieties in these species so radically different as to cause science, unable to account for their source , to call them ‘mutations.’” (Italics added) 15 The author goes on to state that we know only “half of Evolution” and that “mutations” into unexpected species must come from “someplace beyond earth-life.”
    A noted biologist first points out that the elephant or buffalo, when trying to escape a hunter, will cannily go upwind, while the rhino may blunder downwind in panic. He then states: “If Darwin was right – which I do not believe – that only the fittest survive, it is a miracle that this prehistoric idiot [the rhino] exists, unless by fitness Darwin meant only physical fitness, which is absurd.” 16
    The biologist goes on to affirm that he staunchly supports the “whole notion of Evolution” as being a natural process. But: “I could name hundreds [of species] that don't appear to be fit for anything.” He is obliquely referring to the idea of survival of the fittest. He concludes: “Maybe they evolved by natural selection but the point is how have they managed to survive?”
    Natural selection and the survival-of-the-fittest concept are both sore points among various evolutionist factions, since they are hard put to account for sudden, strange mutations that thumb their nose at the orderly progressions of classic Evolution.
    Biologists today often create their own mutations, among fruit flies and guinea pigs in general – in laboratories. Were mutations in the long sweep of Evolution also created in the laboratories of the starmen? And was their most notable mutation Homo sapiens , the creature with superior intelligence beyond the scope of natural selection or survival of the fittest as it applied on Earth?
    Gunther Rosenburg, scholar and researcher into human origins, states that “Man is a unique animal. He stands out like a sore thumb when comparisons are made with his cousins, the apes. The differences are more numerous than the similarities. Darwin's Theory of Evolution is simply unproven.”
    This doubt seems to be shared by other scientists. Vernon L. Gross, a physicist, recently remarked that “Creation and evolutionary theories are not necessarily mutual exclusives. Some of thescientific data may best be explained by a creation theory, while other data substantiate a process of Evolution.” 17 Also, we noted before that the California Board of Education decided that the biblical Creation theory of Man's origin would have equal parity with the Evolution Theory. Shades of the Tennessee Scopes trial!
    But, obviously, much more enlightened investigation and evaluation went into the decision to demote the Evolution Theory – because it could only lamely explain the origin of Man – and therefore to place it on equal terms alongside the old standby of biblical Creation.
    However, this “sharing” of theories to explain a single phenomenon hardly constitutes an advance in solving the mystery and leaves it more unexplained than ever. It means that a single, all-embracing theory remained to be found.
    And that single, all-embracing concept, in all its pristine simplicity, is what this book hopes to supply. We might say that, even if Darwin's theory wins out to scientific minds against the vagaries of divine creation, it still cannot compete, we believe, with the sheer logic of Hybrid Man's creation by starmen. In the following chapters, we will try to solidify this homo hybrid concept as fully as possible in the scientific way .
    The need for a new theory to supplant