without which we would end up withering like flowers without water.
I listened to him and pretended to be taking an interest in what he was saying. But I was really thinking about his birthmark. Why had he suddenly alluded to it while explaining to me his feelings about the Amazonian Indians? Was this the key to Mascaritaâs conversion? In the Peruvian social order those Shipibos, Huambisas, Aguarunas, Yaguas, Shapras, Campas, Mashcos represented something that he could understand better than anyone else: a picturesque horror, an aberration that other people ridiculed or pitied without granting it the respect and dignity deserved only by those whose physical appearance, customs, and beliefs were ânormal.â Both he and they were anomalies in the eyes of other Peruvians. His birthmark aroused in them, in us, the same feelings, deep down, as those creatures living somewhere far away, half naked, eating each otherâs lice and speaking incomprehensible dialects. Was this the origin of Mascaritaâs love at first sight for the tribal Indians, the âchunchosâ? Had he unconsciously identified with those marginal beings because of the birthmark that made him, too, a marginal being, every time he went out on the streets?
I suggested this interpretation to him to see if it put him in a better mood, and in fact he burst out laughing.
âI take it you passed Dr. Guerritaâs psych course?â he joked. âIâd have been more likely to flunk you, myself.â
And still laughing, he told me that Don Salomón Zuratas, being sharper than I was, had suggested a Jewish interpretation.
âThat Iâm identifying the Amazonian Indians with the Jewish people, always a minority and always persecuted for their religion and their mores that are different from those of the rest of society. How does that strike you? A far nobler interpretation than yours, which might be called the Frankenstein syndrome. To each madman his own mania, pal.â
I retorted that the two interpretations didnât exclude each other. He wound up, highly amused, giving free play to his imagination.
âOkay, supposing youâre right. Supposing being half Jewish and half monster has made me more sensitive to the fate of the jungle tribes than someone as appallingly normal as you.â
âPoor jungle tribes! Youâre using them for a crying towel. Youâre taking advantage of them, too, you know.â
âWell, letâs leave it at that. Iâve got a class.â He said goodbye as he got up from the table without a trace of the dark mood of a moment before. âBut remind me next time to set you straight on those âpoor jungle tribes.â Iâll tell you a few things thatâll make your hair stand on end. What was done to them, for instance, in the days of the rubber boom. If they could live through that, they donât deserve to be called âpoor savages.â Supermen, rather. Just waitâyouâll see.â
Apparently he had spoken of his âmaniaâ to Don Salomón. The old man must have come around to accepting the fact that, rather than in halls of justice, Saúl would bring prestige to the name Zuratas in university lecture halls and in the field of anthropological research. Was that what he had decided to be in life? A professor, a researcher? That he had the aptitude I heard confirmed by one of his professors, Dr. José Matos Mar, who was then head of the Department of Ethnology at San Marcos.
âYoung Zuratas has turned out to be a first-rate student. He spent the three months of the year-end vacation in the Urubamba region, doing fieldwork with the Machiguengas, and the lad has brought back some excellent material.â
He was talking to Raúl Porras Barrenechea, a historian with whom I worked in the afternoons, who had a holy horror of ethnology and anthropology, which he accused of replacing man by artifacts as the focal point of