approach. Andrés nods, as if he hadnât heard him, as if it were merely a mechanical, involuntary movement made while his mind is elsewhere. Perhaps heâs listening to his memory, watching all the sick people heâs treated and their families parade past; seeing all
those who were going to die and for whom there was no hope. Perhaps heâs remembering how he put into practice his theory of transparency. Some people even found him hard and inhuman. Others thanked him. Andrés always preferred to share the clinical truth with the objects of that truth, with those weary bodies, transformed into medical material, the recipients of needles and chemicals. It had often fallen to him to say: âIâm sorry, thereâs no hope. Thereâs not even any point trying somewhere else, going to Los Angeles or Houston. You have, at most, two months to live.â
He has always insisted that itâs best to be completely open with a patient. Even at the risk of inoculating him or her with a fear as terrible as the sickness itself. The likelihood is that the patient already suspects it, senses it, is secretly listening to the warnings coming from his or her own body, to the final note sounded by the sickness.
âWe all have the right to know that our life has an end date, a deadline; we all have a right to know when and how we will die, thatâs what Iâve always said.â
âBut now itâs your father whoâs on the other end of the stethoscope. Itâs absurd, Andrés, think about it. You and I know how fast a cancer like this spreads.â
âAnd heâs never even smoked, damn it!â mutters Andrés. âNot a single bloody cigarette in all his life!â he exclaims, pressing his lips together, as if he had bitten on an ice cube.
âThatâs what I mean. Donât you think heâs going to say precisely the same thing and ask the same question? What point is there in him knowing the truth?â
âI canât deceive him now. It wouldnât be right.â
âIâm sorry, but thatâs total bullshit.â
âNo, itâs not. Itâs part of our history, part of what weâve been through together, as father and son.â
âThe big question is: can you do it?â While he speaks, Miguel fidgets on his chair, leans forward, gives a certain confidential tone to his words. âI mean, itâs easier to say such things to a patient, to someone who isnât a member of your family. Itâs upsetting, but itâs not the same; itâs different having your father there before you, and having to say to him: âDad, youâve only got a few more weeks to live.â Thatâs what I mean. Can you do that?â
âNo, I canât.â
Miguel nods, picks up his glass and takes another thoughtful sip before glancing first at his watch and then back at Andrés.
âLet me tell you about a case we had in the department recently,â he says at last.
Miguel is a nephrologist and, as well as having a private practice, he has worked for years as the director of a dialysis unit in a state-run hospital.
âThereâs this one patient, heâs sixty-eight, a grumpy old thing called EfraÃn. Heâs a diabetic, at least thatâs his main ailment. Heâs in the final stages, his kidneys are pretty much buggered, and heâs nearly blind. He has a terrible time on the dialysis machine. He screams and cries. He drives the technicians and the nurses mad. Heâs become very bitter and fed up with life. Worse still: living for him equals suffering. He has to come into the unit three times a week and follow a ghastly diet, he finds
walking very difficult and his life expectancy is reducing by the day, so you can imagine what his life is like. One afternoon, one of the nurses asked if she could speak to me alone. I was a bit puzzled by this at first, but we went into the office and sat