be called The Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle . He would be the editor of this multi-volume Zoology , gathering contributions from his consulting experts, writing introductions and commentaries, commissioning expensive illustrations, to be financed with a grant from Her Majestyâs Treasury. He was now well embedded within the seamless matrix of government, Church, and gentlemanly science. Secretly, he continued talking to himself in the seditious notebooks.
When heâd filled notebook âB,â he started a new one, in maroon leather and labeled âC,â after which would come âDâ and âE,â each devoted to transmutation. He was reading widely in the literature of exploration and natural history, plus a diverse selection of books on animal and plant breeding, history, and philosophy of science; and he had begun putting cryptic questions to anyone who knew anything about the odd, targeted topics that interested him. He debriefed his father, a gusty source of lore on human mental attributes, and his fatherâs gardener. He quizzed livestock breeders about variation and heredity among domestic species. There were so many unknowns to consider. How did inheritance work? What was the difference between species and varieties? What might be deduced from patterns of species distribution around the world? All the islands of Oceania have skinks with golden streaks, he noted. Wild pigs in the Falklands grow stiff, brick-red hair. The kingfisher of the Moluccas scarcely differs from European kingfishers, he wrote, except that its beak is longer and sharper. Were they separate kingfisher species, or just varieties? Cassowaries in New Guinea, tenrecs in Madagascar, geckos on St. Helena. There are no snakes on islands of the central Pacific, he wrote. Black rabbits, introduced onto the Falklands back in 1764, had yielded decades worth of variously colored offspring. Clues, clues, clues. What did they signify, how did they fit? The cuckoos of Java versus the cuckoos of Sumatra and the Philippinesâspecies or varieties? He wanted every possible piece of relevant data, whatever the source. He went to the Regentâs Park Zoo to see its newly acquired orangutan. He became a greedy amasser of seemingly unconnected facts. He busted his brain to connect them. It was an intense program of research and cogitation, all in hours stolen from his public commitments.
âThe changes in species must be very slow,â he figured, not nearly so fast as when domestic breeders select which animals they want to pair. Slow or not, there was a problem to address: When animals continue interbreeding freely, wonât the adaptive differences get blurred away? If so, âall the change that has been accumulated cannot be transmitted.â Maybe isolation somehow prevents that. Maybe sterility between different forms, like the sterility of hybrids in domestic breeding, allows the accumulated change to persist. By now he was making some cocky comments in the notebook about âmy theory,â although that was premature. His theory hadnât yet coalesced. He was still groping to see the scope of the phenomenon, let alone to find a mechanism that would explain it. âStudy the wars of organic being,â he advised himself. Imagine that mankind didnât exist and that monkeys, breeding, improving, eventually produced some sort of alternate intellectual being. Manlike but not Man, and transmuted from four-handed, arboreal animals. That was hard to grasp, sure, but maybe not so much harder than Lyellâs idea about slow, incremental processes accounting for all the big effects in geology. Remember the apteryx, Darwin told himself. If New Zealand had been divided into many islands, would there now be many apteryx species?
Seventy-five pages into the âCâ notebook, in spring 1838, Darwinâs confidence swelled. Grappling with these questions, he admitted, was âa most laborious,