Tags:
adventure,
Mystery,
Texas,
dog,
cowdog,
Hank the Cowdog,
John R. Erickson,
John Erickson,
ranching,
Hank,
Drover,
Pete,
Sally May
donât give a rip, is what Iâm saying.
Well, I had nothing to work with, no evidence, no case. There wasnât a thing I could do until the killer struck again. I could only hope that me and Drover could catch him in the act.
I decided to change my strategy. Instead of throwing a guard around the chickenhouse, we would use the stake-out approach.
âStake-outâ is a technical term which we use in this business. Webster defines âstakeâ as âa length of wood or metal pointed at one end for driving into the ground.â It comes from the Anglo-Saxon word staca , akin to the Danish staak .
âOutâ is defined as âaway from, forth from, or removed from a place, position, or situation.â It comes from the Middle English ut .
Thatâs about as technical as I can make it.
In laymanâs terms, a stake-out is basically a trap. You leave the chickenhouse unguarded, donât you see, and watch and wait and wait and watch until the villain makes his move, and then you swoop in and get him.
Itâs pretty simple, really, when you get used to the terminology.
At dark, me and Drover staked the place out. We hid in some tall weeds maybe thirty feet from the chickenhouse.
Time sure did drag. The first couple of hours we heard coyotes howling off in the pastures. Drover kept looking around with big eyes. I thought he might try to slip off to the machine shed, but he didnât. After a while, he laid his head down on his paws and went to sleep.
I could have kept him awake, I mean, pulled rank and demanded that he stay awake, but I thought, what the heck, the little guy probably needed the sleep. I figgered I could keep watch and wake him up when the time came for action.
Then I fell asleep, but the funny thing about it was that I dreamed I was awake, sitting here and standing guard. I kept saying, âHank, are you still awake?â And Hank said, âSure I am. If I was asleep, you and I wouldnât be talking like this, would we?â And I said, âNo, I suppose not.â
Seems to me itâs kind of a waste of good sleep to dream about what you were doing when you were awake, but thatâs what happened.
I heard something squawk, and I said, âHank, whatâs that?â
âNuthin.â
âYou sure?â
âSure Iâm sure. Youâre wide awake and watching the stake-out, arenât you?â
âI think so, yes.â
âThen stop worrying.
The squawking went on and the next thing I knew, Drover was jumping up and down. âHank, oh Hank, heâs back, murder, help, blood, we fell asleep, oh my gosh, Hank, wake up!â
âHuh? I ainât asleep.â And right then my eyes popped open and I woke up. âDang the luck, I was asleep! I was afraid of that.â
We dashed out of the weeds and found a body south of the chickenhouse door. The M.O. was the same. (Thereâs another technical term, M.O. It stands for Modus of Operationus, which means how it was done. We shorten it to M.O.)
A pattern began to emerge. The killer had struck twice and both times he had killed a white leghorn hen. (Actually, that might not have been a crucial point because there werenât any other-colored hens on the place, but I mention it to demonstrate the kind of deep thinking that goes into solving a case of this type. You canât overlook a single detail, even those that donât mean anything.)
But the most revealing clue was that the murderer hadnât dragged his victim off. That meant that he hadnât killed for food, but only for the sport of it. In other words, we had a pathagorical killer on the loose.
This was very significant, the first big break in the case. At last I had an M.O. that narrowed the suspects down to coyotes, coons, skunks, badgers, foxes . . . rats, it hadnât eliminated anybody and I was right back where I started.
I hunkered down and studied the body. It was still