first observed it. Star 33 had a clear wobble, with an amplitude that corresponded to a very large planet or, more likely, a brown dwarf, the name for a small failed star. Finding a transiting brown dwarf was almost as exciting back then as finding a large planet, so we rushed testing OGLE-TR-33, only to find that it failed the last test. We could not believe itâwe had even started writing a paper to the journal Nature , while doing our test and models for a second time. Now we had to abandon it. In the meantime, another
one of our top candidates had passed all its tests with flying colors. Initially we had neglected it because OGLE-TR-33 had a clear large wobble and had seemed an easier nut to crack. This star was OGLE-TR-56, and it looked like a Jupiter-mass planet.
As November was ending, we had finally discovered the nature of OGLE-TR-33: it was a system of three stars, two of which orbit each other very closely and eclipse each other, while a large star nearby, the big and brightest in the system, washes out the deep eclipse of the other two. The third star does not have a wobble of its own, but a large wobble of another star in the system (its spectral lines have a large Doppler shift) causes a small distortion in the spectral lines of the third star. Because the third star rotates fast and its spectral lines are broad, that small distortion was just enough to give us the impression of a small wobble, as if due to a planet that matches the shallow washed-out eclipse. OGLE-TR-33 was the ultimate tricky false positive! 12
Now we focused our full attention on OGLE-TR-56. It had passed all our tests, including the spectral lines distortion test that had uncovered OGLE-TR-33 as a false positive. We felt very confident that OGLE-TR-56b was a planet precisely because of our experience with OGLE-TR-33 and the other false positives our new transiting method had helped uncover. The method was working, and we quickly got a paper accepted for publication in Nature. 13 In the first week of January 2003 I flew to Seattle to present our discovery to the meeting of the American Astronomical Society. Just like
Captain James Cook 235 years earlier, we had crisscrossed the Pacific Ocean to catch a glimpse of a transit, and we had succeeded.
To top it off, OGLE-TR-56b was an exotic planetâa record holder in several ways: the shortest known orbital period (only twenty-nine hours), hence the hottest known planet (close to 2000 K), as well as the most distant extrasolar planet (at about 5,000 light-years from Earth). The exotic properties caught the attention of the media, while for us and the planet hunters the biggest excitement was that the transiting method for planet discovery was finally figured out. In short, the unexpected large fraction of false positives had been the major obstacle, and our set of tests and use of stellar models solved the problem. Within the next three years we and several other teams would use our approach successfully to confirm more than a dozen new transiting planets. The path to discovering a true Earth was now open. A new age of exploration was upon us.
The first age of exploration began in the fifteenth century. In 1484 one of the men whose efforts would define the era, Christopher Columbus of Genoa, was trying to convince King João II of Portugal to finance his expedition to cross the Atlantic. The king was reluctant, not because he thought Earth was flat, but because Columbus insisted that it was only 10,000 miles around the equator, and that the westward route to India and the Spice Islands would be short. Portuguese sailors (who, thanks to the support of Prince Henry the Navigator earlier in the century, had sailed up and down the Atlantic by the African coast) had estimated a much
larger size for the planet, pole to pole, and had gotten a number much closer to the actual value of about 25,000 miles. (Back in the third century BC, Eratosthenes, a Greek mathematician, had already estimated