gnat-like voice, once remarked: âI used to be reckoned a good singer before these here
tunes
came in.â The
tunes
he spoke of with such scorn had come in with a vengeance, and it seemed that his kind of songs, once so much admired, would be swept away by the flood of commercial popular music.â)
I remember, once, being convalescent in bed and my mother coming back from the town in high feather. We had been talking of getting a book of songs, chiefly for the words, for my mother couldnât read music: either she knew a tune or she didnât. âDicky, Iâve
got
a book, and itâs got âClementineâ and âJohn Peelâ and âPolly Wolly Doodleâ and all those!â I think we started in right away. âPolly Wolly Doodleâ, of course, was also a mystery to me. Later, I used to think it must be about a runaway slave. Now, I think itâs about a Confederate deserter in the Civil War.
My mother used to tell me, too, about Violet Lorraine in
The Bing Boys,
and sing âIf you were the only girl in the worldâ. And of course there was âAll the nice girls love a sailorâ and âTipperaryâ and many more.
I think that if you want a child to grow up to love music, singing to it is important. The thing was, my mother enjoyed the singing as much as I did, and
I was the only person she could do it with.
Otherwise she would have been self-conscious. I donât know why, but somehow my mother couldnât have sung with my brother on the piano. She had to be unaccompanied and uncriticized.
She read to me, too. Beatrix Potter, of course. And Pooh. This was the heyday of A. A. Milne - 1924 to 1928. Everyone read
When We Were Very Young
and Pooh: everyone quoted them. Everyone knew that Christopher Robin went down with Alice, and that he said his prayers. What do I think of it now? I think a lot of the light verse is pleasant for a child, but needs to be mixed up with better stuff. As for the stories, I think them too trivial, but they are redeemed by the marvellous characters. Characters are the essence of fiction. This is the limitation of folk tales, of course: marvellous stories and no characters. The prince is a prince and the dragon is a dragon like other dragons. âPoohâ will survive on the characters all right, no danger. But Beatrix Potter will survive on story, style and characters. She reads much better than Pooh once youâre grown-up and, as C.S. Lewis said, âA book thatâs not worth reading when youâre sixty is not worth reading when youâre six.â I wouldnât say Pooh is not worth reading, but I do think thereâs a detectable condescension and self-conscious âcutenessâ about it.
My mother also read me poetry. Robert Louis Stevensonâs
Childâs Garden of Verses,
and âYoung Lochinvarâ and âJohn Gilpinâ and âThe Pied Piperâ and âUp the Airy Mountainâ and pretty well everything else that a child can take in. I used to shiver at âLa Belle Dame Sans Merciâ, and indeed Iâd think twice, myself, before letting it loose on a small child. The great virtue of Stevenson, as I see it now, is that itâs poetry for poetryâs sake - not poetry telling stories. You can start a child on pure poetry with Stevenson.
As I got older, my father used to read to me, too. He wouldnât have read Beatrix Potter - and certainly not Pooh - but he would read R.M. Ballantyne -
The Coral Island, The Gorilla Hunters,
etc. - and
Treasure Island
and
Kidnapped
; and even the âDimsieâ stones of Dorita Fairlie Bruce. Above all, we read
Dr Dolittle.
The Dr Dolittle books were coming out new at this time, 1922 to 1932. (Hugh Lofting evidently wrote at great speed.) The shortcomings of the Dolittle books are easy enough for an adult to pin down. The animals, in their mentalities, are really just human beings in a way in which the animals in