contemporary and French counterpart Athénaïs de Montespan was also an avid card player and gambled heavily, sometimes hazarding several hundred thousand pounds on the play of a single card. She won often, and when she didnât, Louis XIV routinely paid off her debts. One Christmas Day she lost the staggering sum of £230,000, kept playing, and won back £500,000 on one play involving three cards.
Since the beginning of her relationship with Emperor Franz Josef in 1886, Katharina Schratt benefited by having her gambling debts paid. She routinely lost frightful sums at the casino in Monte Carlo and seems to have suffered an addiction to gambling. In 1890 she lost all her travel money and had to borrow her train fare back to Vienna. This happened again in 1906, when she lost no less than two hundred thousand francs and found herself stranded on the Riviera with a nasty red rash all over her body. She immediately contacted the emperor, who was so angry he let her stew awhile before responding. He finally sent her the money and a letter brimming with reproaches.
The imperial mistress replied, âA thousand thanks for your dear kind letter. The doctor, who at first thought I had chicken-pox, is now of the opinion that Monte Carlo is responsible for my rash. My heavy losses appear to have upset my stomach, then my nerves and finally affected my skin. If only your Majesty had inherited the gambling instincts of some of your ancestors, then you would be able to sympathize and understand, and I would not have to go through the world disfigured and misunderstood.â 12
The emperor, so thrifty that he wrote urgent telegrams on old scraps of paper, wrote back, âI am glad you are happy again and so hope that by now you are fully recovered. Medical science has obviously made a new discovery through your illness, for Ihave never before heard of a rash brought on by bad luck at gambling.â 13
Pensions and Cash
Royal mistresses were usually given monthly allowancesâoften startling sumsâwhich rapidly vanished, often leaving the mistress in debt at the end of the month. What happened to the royal largesse? Quite simply, the mistress had to keep up appearancesâroyal appearances. She was required to be a glorious accessory to the glory of the king. Not all her gowns and jewels arrived in gift boxes from her royal lover; the mistress had to keep herself fashionable with part of her allowance. There was an unspoken rule that the royal mistressâs wardrobe had to outshine that of all the other ladies at courtâincluding the queen.
Even Lillie Langtry, who did not receive a regular allowance from Edward VII, was expected to appear in an astonishing array of new gowns. In her later years, Lillie reported that she had had only one quarrel with Edward during her three-year tenure as his mistress. âI wore a dress of white and silver at two balls in succession,â she reminisced. âI did not know that he was going to be present at both balls, but he was. He came up to me on the second night and exclaimed, âThat damned dress again!â He walked away in a temperâ¦. It took me a long time to make it upâ¦. That was the only quarrel we ever had.â 14
Lillie, who had come to London with just one plain black dress, patronized the fashion houses of Worth and Doucet. Her evening gowns were embroidered with pearls, her tea gowns bordered with silver fox, her dressing gowns lined with ermine. For a ball at Marlborough House, Lillie appeared in a confection of yellow tulle over which a gold net held preserved butterflies of various sizes and colors.
In the 1890s Edwardâs second official mistress, Daisy Warwick, never paid less than five thousand dollars in todayâs money for a gown, often far more. Society columns gushed about the âviolet velvet with two splendid turquoise-and-diamond brooches in her bodiceâ she wore to a ball; the âgauzy whitegown beneath