said, only a trifle sarcastically, âthereâs no such thing as an insect man per se . In Roderick the Greatâs vocabulary, insects are components of dedicated symbiotic partnerships ; their early evolution took place in harness with the evolution of flowering plants, as a complex pas de deux . In Usher mythology, an insectâs place is in the bosom of a flower, trading its services as a pollen-distributor for nectar.â
âYouâre being flippant,â he said. âThat might apply, albeit loosely, to bees, but insects are extraordinarily versatile, ecologically speakingâalmost as versatile as worms. Only a tiny minority are involved in pollination, or any other kind of symbiosis, and then only as imagoes.â
âThat was the past, Professor,â I reminded him. âThe Ushers are looking to the future. From now onâ¦from fifty years ago, in factâ¦the fate of insects is to be whatever the Hive of Industry wants them to be. Pests out, symbiotes in, no neutrals. Anyway, insects were never all that versatile. There might still be hundreds of thousands of beetle species left, out of the pre-Crash millions, but theyâre all just beetles. The insects never contrived to recolonize the sea in the way that reptiles, mammals and birds did. There arenât any insects in my little corner of creationâyet.â
âYouâre still being flippant,â was Professor Crowthorneâs expert judgment. Gallantly, he added: âAnd why not? We take ourselves and our work too seriously, sometimesâand in the face of tragedy, of matters that we canât control, no matter how clever we might be as biotechnicians, what psychological weapons do we have, except for a refusal not to take things too seriously? You have to laugh or youâd cryâisnât that what they say up there in Lancashire.â
His idea of northern parlance had obviously been forged by historical dramas on TV, but he meant well.
âSo itâs rumored,â I agreed.
CHAPTER THREE
Fortunately, the family members were beginning to make their appearance and fill up the front rows of the auditorium. The daughters didnât enter in a disciplined file, but there was an order of sorts to their gradual filtration. The older ones were looking after the younger ones. I wasnât really countingâI was looking for Rowland, still believing that he was bound to appearâbut I couldnât help being aware that the daughters were more than a dozen strong, perhaps nearer to twenty in total.
Rowland didnât appear. Maybe, I thought, right up until the last possible moment, he was going to come in last, escorting Rosalind as a dutiful son should. Maybe, I thought, the tragedy of Magdalenâs suicideâor Magdalenâs death, if it had been accidentalâhad brought them together in grief, had healed their differences and united the family again. Maybe, I thought, there might be something resembling a happy ending to place in the credit column against the debit of Magdalenâs loss, to provide some crumb of consolation, if not to produce some impossible semblance of balance in the books.
But Rowland didnât appear. When Rosalind finally made her grand entrance, she was alone: unaccompanied, unsupported, devoid of any symbiotic partnership, dedicated or otherwise.
How could I ever have thought that it might be otherwise? Of course Rosalind was alone. If Rowland had been there, he would have been sent to sit down, not allowed to stand beside Rosalind, or even slightly behind her.
She was perfectly composed, and quite beautiful, in her own way. In an era of sophisticated somatic engineering, any woman can be beautiful, in a conventional sense, but distinctive beauty is still rare and precious, and Rosalind had it, more than any of her beautiful daughters. She wasnât as pretty as Magdalen, as charming as Magdalen or as lovable as Magdalen, but she was more
Marina Dyachenko, Sergey Dyachenko