oleaginated back.
âWould you like Mr Bonnet to write it on the reverse for you?â
âLovely,â she cooed. Jacob relaxed and smirked. I went and took down the painting, pulled a pencil from my inside pocket. I hesitated at what I knew was another defining moment. I could jot down something obscene and insulting, draw a vicious caricature of Mrs van Damm, sketch my own face with extended tongue. Instead, I looked at my happy parents, Vorderman chestswelling and relaxed, sighed and wrote âDoggie in Pasticheâ. Yet in some strange way, I was enjoying this, biting down on my own pain and humiliation in a toothache-sucking fashion. Dr Freud was teaching us to call that âmasochismâ.
Over by the drinks table, knocking it back without dissimulation, was a bunch of my contemporaries at the art school. As I approached, they turned to face me and greeted me with undisguised sniggers.
âAt least the food and wine is the real stuff,â smirked Bakker, a skinny, stooped figure in a threadbare jacket, who passed for something of a radical in student circles.
âMeaning the art isnât?â
He fluttered fingers of protesting innocence. âDid I say that? People come for different things.â He poured another glass to show what he had come for. At least they were using glasses, not swigging directly from the bottle. âThe last public event that was sure enough of an audience to go uncatered was probably the crucifixion. But what happened to constructivism, expressionism, surrealism ⦠even impressionism, for Godâs sake?
âThis stuff â¦â he swung the glass unsteadily round the room â⦠isnât what youâd call directly destructive of late capitalism is it, old man?â He smiled with false sweetness and slipped a condescending arm around my shoulder. I shook myself free.
âIs that what art is to be measured by, its power of destruction? What about the giving of innocent pleasure, the struggle for form and mastery of technique â the purely aesthetic?â
They fell about in simulated humorous collapse, slapped each other on the back, gasped for air, clutched at the table. The silent films, with their exaggerated gestures, were upon us.
âTrue art,â he smirked as one imparting a sad lesson to a slow child, âis the expression of the will of the proletariat.â
âBut, but â¦â I thought of my firm-chested peasants, my noble horny-handed sons of toil â⦠does not every line here speak of the dignity of labour, the integrity of the peasant?â
His eyes blazed with anger. âBourgeois false consciousness,â he snarled. Red spots of sale appeared in his cheeks. âThe rural masses collaborating in their own exploitation?â
I pointed to my own red spots. âDoes it count for nothing that so many have been sold? You lot would give your right arm â arms â to sell like that.â
Bakker, suddenly calm, regarded me with genuine pity. âDear boy. The fact that so many people buy you is the clearest proof of all that, either you are no good, or you are being tragically misunderstood.â He pursed his lips to deliver oracular judgement. âMy own view is that they understand you only too well.â He sneered. âGo on. Go back to your â¦â he camply lisped the word and did something showgirly with his legs âpublicâ, making it obscene.
I turned abruptly, eyes full of tears, only to cannon into something small and hard â a diminutive person, all in black with prominent teeth and hand outstretched, a sort of bucktoothed Toulouse Lautrec.
âTidmans,â he sucked inspiration from the teeth, â Telegraf .â
Tidmans, the famous art-critic whose articles were like little polished jewels, collected to be published every year in book form. He was justly famous for his insight, his uncanny ability to go beyond the particular in