Theyâre doing it in slow motion. In some movies they show the violent parts in slow motion to increase the effect. Like violence shot into our blood. A hypodermic. In our veins. We sense their movements in a mad modern ballet. Two naked bodies violently intertwined in a pas de deux of death. My sex keeps rising, obeying a secret command beyond my will. Miz Literature turns slightly on her axis, watching it rise with a disconcerting stare. She lowers herself towards me, reducing the angle to fifteen degrees. In the sitting position. Her eyes still staring. I close mine and Miz Literature, in a trance, takes me in her mouth. Between her beautiful pink lips. Iâd dreamed of it. Iâd licked my chops over it. I didnât dare ask her. An act so . . . I knew that as long as she hadnât done it, she wouldnât be completely mine. Thatâs the key in sexual relations between black and white: as long as the woman hasnât done something judged degrading, you can never be sure.
Because in the scale of Western values, white woman is inferior to white man, but superior to black man. Thatâs why she canât get off except with a Negro. Itâs obvious why: she can go as far as she wants with him. The only true sexual relation is between unequals. White women must give white men pleasure, as black men must for white women. Hence, the myth of the Black stud. Great in bed, yes, but not with his own woman. For she has to dedicate herself to his pleasure. Upstairs, Beelzebub is back for another go-round. And now Miz Literature is giving me some kind of blow job. I think of the faraway village where I was born. Of all those blacks who traveled to a white manâs land in search of riches and came back empty-handed. I donât know whyâit has nothing to do with whatâs going onâ but I think of a song I heard years ago. A guy in my village had a Motown record. The song was about a lynching. The lynching in St. Louis of a young black man. He was hanged then castrated. Why castrated? Iâll never stop wondering about that. Why castrated? Can you tell me? Of course no one wants to get involved with a question like that. Iâd love to know, Iâd like to be one hundred percent sure whether the myth of the animalistic, primitive, barbarous black who thinks only of fucking is true or not. Evidence. Show me evidence. Definitively, once and for all. No one can. The world has grown rotten with ideologies. Who will risk taking a position on a subject like that? As a black, I donât have enough distance. Are black men sensual pigs? Are white men pale pigs? Yellow men refined pigs? Red men bleeding pigs? Only Pig is Pig. I donât know why I always imagined the universe like that Matisse painting. Something about it struck me. Itâs my essential vision of things. Iâm talking about âGrand Intérieur Rougeâ (1948). Primary colors. Strong, alive, violent and loud. Pictures inside a larger canvas. Everywhere flowers in different-sized pots. On two tables. A dark chair. On the wall a painting by the artist (the pineapple one) separated by a black demarcation. Under the table, a calico cat chased by a dog. Stylized, allusive strokes. Splashes of bright color. The skins of two beasts under the curved legs of the table on the right. The painting is primitive, animal, gregarious, fierce, flightly, tribal fantasy. You can feel a playful kind of cannibalism verging on immediate happiness. Right there, before your eyes. With those loud, primary colors and violent sexuality (despite the calm the eye feels) offering a new version of love in this modern jungle. When I ask myself hard questions about the role of color in sexuality, I remember Matisseâs answer. I have been carrying it with me ever since. I didnât yet know it would not be enough to counter the storms of life, and that I would probably die with the teeth of that problem sunk into my neck.
Without warning I