that he gave few concerts and supported himself by performing at night in a bar. We decided to go to the bar to hear him despite his efforts to dissuade us. With the Chinese gift for lyrical euphemism, a sign outside identified the establishment in English as the SUNSHINE-AFTER-EIGHT FRIEND-CHANGING CLUB . It was a brothel. Whenever a friend has since needed changing,I fantasize a trip back to northwest China, and I remember the young women from the provinces, some defiant and many sad in their flimsy negligees.
Even when one is paying attention, it is easy to become confused in alien surroundings for lack of reference points. In Prague in 1985, my friend Cornelia Pearsall and I studied the only available tourist map and decided that we ought to visit the Jewish ghetto, number sixteen on the map. Expecting squalor, we were pleasantly surprised to find a complex of beautiful apartments, many with spectacular views. Since all the signage was in Czech, we had to work out the narrative for ourselves. Cornelia noted the large number of pianos about, and I explained that the Jewish community in Prague had been highly cultured and artistically accomplished. Only two days later did we discover that the Jewish ghetto was actually number seventeen on our map, and that we had spent the afternoon at Mozart’s villa.
Sometimes one simply doesn’t understand what one is looking at. I got to know former US secretary of defense Robert McNamara when he was in his eighties. The man behind the draft that had so terrified me in childhood had destroyed a country, occasioned a million needless deaths, and accomplished nothing. He was now a congenial senior citizen, regretful of the gruesome crossroads of history that he had traversed. He described returning to Vietnam and meeting some of his military counterparts there. The conversation, as he described it, consisted of the Vietnamese asking, “Why did you do X?” Then McNamara said, “Well, because you did Y, which meant such and such.” Then the Vietnamese would counter, “No, no, no, it meant the exact opposite of that! But then you did this thing that was clearly an attempt to escalate!” To which McNamara would comment, “No, we did that to try to quiet things down, because we thought you . . . ,” and so on and on and on. McNamara’s errors proceeded from his ignorance about his opponents—a problem much exacerbated by the dismissal of Asia experts from the US government and universities during the purges of McCarthyism. Like Cornelia and me in Mozart’s villa, McNamara was applying off-base assumptions to a place he had completely misunderstood. Had more than a million deaths not occurred in the Vietnam War, his encounter with his former foes couldhave been something out of a French farce. To learn a place is like getting to know a person: it is an exercise in depth psychology. You must understand those with whom you communicate to understand the content of their communication. It takes modesty to recognize that your coherence is someone else’s incoherence and vice versa. “We argued in the language of war,” McNamara said to me, “which I wrongly thought was a universal language.”
----
Much is made of the difference between tourism and travel. Tourists are said to move about in clusters and to reassure themselves with unflattering comparisons between wherever they are visiting and their homeland. Travelers venture forth because they want to experience a place, not just see it. When Flemming Nicolaisen, a Greenlandic Inuit friend, visited me in New York on his first foreign trip, he seemed uninterested in the Statue of Liberty, the Metropolitan Museum, Broadway shows. He preferred taking my dog for long walks all over town. “When you came to Greenland,” he said, “did you want to see the war memorial? Or the museum in Nuuk?” I had to admit that I mostly wanted to be surrounded by the prismatic landscape of ice. He pointed out that the entire population of