Ms. Herschel said. âInterviewing is a great way to get information.â
âThank you! Thereâs more!â Patrick held up a photo that he had printed out. âThis is a shoe print. Someonewith dirty shoes left this print right here at the scene of the crime.â He pointed to the floor in front of the chalkboard. âAs you can see, they donât belong to Ms. Herschel. I checked with Mr. Browning, the custodian. He said he mopped the floor the night before and did not return to the classroom in the morning. So . . . I believe the shoe prints belong to the thief.â He pointed to the picture. âSee this distinctive tread pattern with an âOâ in the center? During recess, I found matching footprints in the mud. Through careful observation, I discovered who the footprints belong to.â
Everyone was silent, waiting.
Patrick grinned.
âWell, who is it?â Kip blurted out.
âThe person who has a shoe print with an âOâ is . . . Taz Raskel!â
âI knew it!â Maia exclaimed.
Everybody looked at Tazâs feet.
âSo? My shoe prints were on the floor,â Taz argued. âWhat does that mean? I was the first person in the room. Of course my shoe prints would be on the floor.â
âAccording to Ms. Peabody in the office, you were the first student in the
building
,â Patrick said. âYou had the time to commit the crime without being seen.â
âNow Patrick,â Ms. Herschel interrupted. âI like that youâre observing shoe print impressions. Thatâs what an investigator would look for. But remember, just because you find a shoe print near a crime scene, doesnât mean the shoe print belongs to the criminal. Taz does come in early every day to check on the pets, so it makes sense that his shoe prints would be here.â
âWell,â Patrick said, âI have another piece of evidence!â He held up another photograph.
âWhat is it?â Kip asked, trying to see.
âItâs a photograph I took of a poem written in the boyâs bathroom.â Patrick read:
There once was a
great dude named Taz
Who had a lot of
pizazz!
He likes to play jokes
On all kinds of folks
Especially the kids in
his clazz!
Ms. Herschel looked at the picture and sighed. âTaz, thatâs your handwriting. You know youâre not supposed to write on bathroom doors!â
âThe poem proves that Taz likes to play jokes on people and likes poetry.â Patrick summed it up. âThose are two things that are true of the thief. And we know that Taz is a pet lover. So my theory is that Taz wanted Slurpy all to himself. He took Slurpy, but then he felt guilty about it, so he called his mom. I was a witness.â
âWait!â Taz said. âAnother crime has been committed. Someone stole the brain right out of Patrickâs head.â
The class laughed, but Patrickâs theory made Taz look awfully guilty. Edgar couldnât bear the thought that Patrickhad solved the crime, so he looked at the picture of Tazâs poem, trying to find a hole in his theory. âWait!â he cried. âTaz couldnât be the thief! The thief has great handwriting and Tazâs is terrible!â
âHey, heâs right,â Taz said.
Ms. Herschel nodded. âInteresting observation, Edgar. Forensic investigators often use handwriting analysis to solve crimes. Patrick . . . we canât accuse unless we have solid evidence. At this point, I believe we all still need to keep our eyes and ears open.â
âYeah, Patrick,â Taz said.
Patrick glared at Edgar.
Ms. Herschel stepped between them. âEdgar, have you uncovered anything else that might help?â
Edgar looked at his notebook. Sadly, nothing he had done so far was any good. The theory about a professional fish thief, the worry about Mister Furball and the kindergarten