being on the look out for small social things he hadnât got the hang of. But this thought detained his mind only for a moment. It was the painting itself that he continued to feel uneasy about. There wasnât much sense in that. It had, of course, been idle chat about the painting which had triggered off the great thought. But there was nothing at all important about that; nothing about Lelyâs daub was anywhere near the centre of his design; his sense of discomfort before the thing lay in some other area.
âJust what would you say youâre up to?â Carson was startled to hear himself ask an almost philosophical question, which wasnât his style at all. But he persisted with it. âI mean to say, just what do you aim at?â
âBread and cheese. Shoes for the kids.â
âThereâs going to be that, I suppose. And fillet steak for quite some time as well.â Carson had to make an effort to capture this lightness of air. âBut itâs not what I mean, Lely. A young fellow of mine, looking at the thing lately, asked if you were going after an icon. It seems an icon is something you find in Russian churches, and lurking in Russian homes and hovels. So it didnât make sense.â
âIâm not so sure about that. When a painter made that sort of icon â probably of the Blessed Virgin â he was out to produce something evoking reverence. And thereâs always been plenty of that all over the place. Think of a Rigaud of Louis Quatorze.â Lely paused, but Carson, being unable to achieve this think, remained silent. âPlenty of it in this country, too,â Lely went on. âBoth in pigment and marble. Newton with his prism and silent face. Or Watts doing Tennyson or Browning. Icons, decidedly.â
âYouâre not after that ,â Carson said, getting his bearings at last.
âWell, no. Then thereâs the likeness. There must have been a time when the ability to get a likeness out of some blobs of paint on a palette seemed downright miraculous. Most of the affairs you see at the Academy every year are likenesses â or likenesses cosmeticized. Over the past hundred years or so, the likeness has been taking some hard knocks from the photograph. On Tennyson, for instance, Watts and Julia Margaret Cameron were already neck and neck. Well, that leaves the portrait. By and large, the thing weâre now looking at aims to be a portrait.â
âThe portrait adds something to the likeness?â Carson, so little a fool, was now right on the ball. âItâs more informative?â
âSo they assert.â Lely was cautious. âBut, you know, a lot of nonsense is talked about it all. Shakespeare was sceptical, wouldnât you say? Thereâs no art to find the mindâs construction in the face. One may smile, and smile, and be a villain. Itâs only the real swells that manage it. Raphael, painting a pope. Or Rembrandt, late on.â
Carson was able to reflect that the chance of Humphry Lely being a Raphael or Rembrandt was insubstantial. He continued to be uncomfortable, nevertheless. And something of this Lely perhaps discerned, and was thereby prompted to his next remark.
âBut it seems to me there continue to be vestigial magic associations surrounding the whole thing. Have you noticed there are people who hate even being included in a snapshot? They slope off on any excuse that comes into their head. And in primitive societies it can be very marked â or even in some not so primitive. Arabs, now. They invented mathematics, and heaven knows what. But aim a camera at one, and heâll knock it out of your hand. Probably give you a bloody nose as well. And it isnât our sort of western nonsense about the invasion of privacy â although that may have the same roots, I suppose. Itâs a superstitious belief that if I possess your likeness I thereby hold some supernatural power over
London Casey, Ana W. Fawkes