deluded himself into thinking he was conscious, and then proclaimed that
this consciousness, this delusion, was reality. There are several stumbling blocks
to communication between linear and nonlinear systems. The major one is that linear
systems do not exist. All that exists are the operations of the brain, the direct
experience, a nonlinear oscillation.
Instead of looking to the world of man, to the linear abstractions, to the conscious
motivations, etc., attention must be turned to a universe of control patterns, patterns
of complete control, the nonlinear process of neural activity. The message in this
system is the communication of pattern. “A message need not be the result of a conscious
human effort for the transmission of ideas.” 42 Work on the level of deciphering the patterns that have always existed but that man
hardly even suspected. Consider the notion of power engineering: “The main function
of power engineering is transmission of energy or power from one place to another
with its generation by appropriate generators and its employment by appropriate motors
or lamps or other such apparatus. So long as this is not associated with transmission
of a particular pattern, as for example in processes of automatic control, power engineering
remains a separate entity with its own technique.” 43 Man was a separate entity with its own technique. The unity is methodological. Concentrate
on communication of operant pattern. The only experience that is real is in the operations
of the brain. The individual experience, the private experience, the personal experience:
illusion. The end of the individual.
Man concerned himself with meaning. His books, plays, movies, television programs,
were considered only in terms of what they had to say, what they had to communicate
in ideas. But experience was itself the communication, what the brain did. Man was
oblivious to these changes. A story was a story—complete with plots, morals, points
of view, and ultimate meanings—to fit within preestablished value systems. Considerations
of story on the neural level are another story. Recent research has shown that “the
parts of the brain from which memories are evoked so easily and regularly are those
we find most liable to exaggerated electrical discharge during flicker, and it is
here too that in normal subjects the pattern of incoming stimuli can be seen abstracted
and preserved for some time after the stimulation has ceased.” 44
The movie experience is a flicker experience of a frequency of twenty-four times per
second, slightly higher and safer than the level considered dangerous for certain
brains. The reflection of projected light from a treated surface, a surface encompassing
up to eighty percent of the visual field, can have the effect on the neural level
of an electronic brain message. Where is the meaning when we realize the emotional
response is a function of the flicker experience reactivating memory imprints stored
in the operant circuits of the brain? The implications of such a hypothesis are obvious.
How can we merely discuss “I like it / I don’t like it” without reference to questions
about the brain’s activity, a universe without I’s.
Neural energy is not produced by the major receptors for sensory stimuli. The sources
for neural energy are the gravitational receptors, the stretchingtype muscles. “The
visual receptors, bringing in up to two-thirds of the sensory stimuli for the brain,
are useless as a source of neural energy.” 45 In this light, look to the transaction between the environmental force and the organism
in terms of the information provided to the brain. The visual receptors tend to pick
up light as motion. “The human eye has economically confined its best form and color
vision to a relatively small fovea, while its perception of motion is better on the
periphery. When peripheral