self tell you why. With age comes wisdom, you know.â
Down the aisle Griffin went. He stooped to pick up the tennis ball along the way, and then disappeared through the double doors.
His other self reached into a pocket and set that same tennis ball atop the podium. âThere goes the pragmatic resolution of our dilemma. By making a simple loop in time, I was able to witness the same moment from two different perspectives. Causality was not violated. There was no paradox involved.
âSimilarly, all your actions in the pastâall your future actions, everything you will doâhave already existed for millions of years, and are a part of what led inevitably to this present moment. Donât obsess about the repercussions of simple actions. Step on as many butterflies as you wishâthe present is safe.
âHowever, suppose when I entered the room just now, I decided to behave differently than I had witnessed myself behaving the first time. Suppose that rather than shake hands, Iâd decided to punch myself out. Suppose then my earlier self had become so irate that he refused to travel into the past. What then?â
âIt couldnât have happened!â somebody called from the audience. âIt didnâtâso it couldnât.â
âSo common sense would tell you. Howeverâslide!â The incomprehensible physical equations again filled the screen. âCommon sense has very little to do with physics. Unhappily, paradox is only too possible.
âLetâs imagine that when I came into this room, with this tennis ball in my pocket, I kicked the original of it out of my way in the aisle, sending it skittering in among this amiable sea of friendly faces. This would have prevented my earlier self from picking it up in the first place. Where, then, would this tennis ball have come from? Suppose also that I subsequently took this ball and gave it to my earlier self to take back in time so I could bring it here to pass back into time.â He tossed the ball back and forth between his hands. âWhere did it come from? Where does it go? If it came spontaneously into being, as a miracle of quantum physics, then why does it have the Spalding logo stamped into its side?â
Nobody laughed. A few in the audience cleared their throats uncomfortably.
âEither of those instancesâthe refusal to perform a previously witnessed act, or the tennis ball from nowhereâwould have been a massive violation of cause and effect. There are extremely good reasons why this cannot be allowed to occur. I am not permitted even to hint at these reasons, but I can assure you that we take them very seriously indeed.
âThe bottom line is simply this: Could you go back in time and kill your own grandfather? Yes and no. Yes, it could happen. Thereâs nothing in the physical nature of reality to prevent it. No, we wonât permit it to happen.
âWe have means of detecting a paradox before it actually happensâand, again, I wonât tell you what they are. But any threat to this precious and fragile enterprise will be nipped in the bud, I can assure you that. And those responsible will be punished. No exceptions. And no clemency, either.â
He slipped the tennis ball back in his pocket. âAny questions?â
A spry old gent who might have been the father of someone Leyster once worked with, stood. âWhat if, in spite of your best efforts, a paradox slips by you?â
âThe entire project would be canceled. Retroactively. By which I mean that this wonderful opportunity will then have never been placed before you. Itâs harsh, butâI have been assured by those who knowâabsolutely necessary.â
A woman stood. âWhat would become of us, then?â
âCut free from causality, our entire history from that moment onward would become a timelike loop and dissolve.â
âExcuse me. What does that mean?â
Griffin smiled.