in touch with him without my knowing it. I donât know, it was just a thought I had.â
Morton keeps his poker face, but it dawns on Rena from the way he doesnât ask her for Reedâs last name that Saul has already told him about Reed, and then she wonders if Mortonâs not asking is purposeful, that he canât tell them what Saul has told him so heâs leaving them this clue.
âAnybody else heâd see regularly?â
âHow about Santiago?â Leonard says. âDidnât he read to him every week?â
âWhoâs that?â
âHe was a professor of Saulâs at Swarthmore,â Leonard says. âA political scientist from Cuba. He came here in the fifties to take a position at Temple University, then lost his visa during the McCarthy era and had to leave to teach in Mexico. When he came back, he and his wife settled here in New York and he did some visiting teaching jobs. He was in his seventies by then, but still a marvelous teacher.â
Morton glances at Rena, checking her reaction.
âSantiago had a big influence on Saul,â Leonard continues. âHe introduced him to Marxist theory, really made it come alive for him. Then, the year after Saul met him, Santiagoâs son disappeared in Guatemala. It was clearly a kidnapping, but unclear who had done it. Saul was convinced it was a paramilitary police faction and that the CIA had been involved. He organized a committee to help raise money for Santiago and his wife to carry on their search.â
âDid they find him?â
âNo. Not even a trace. Then Santiago went blind. He was too old and dispirited to learn braille. When Saul came to New York for medical school, he became one of Santiagoâs readers.â
âHow often would he see him?â
âEvery Tuesday,â Rena says. âThough this past year, I think it was pretty irregular.â
âWhatâs your take on him?â Morton asks Rena.
âI never met him. He and Saul had their routine, and â¦â She stops, reluctant to admit that sheâd never wanted to meet Santiago, not because he didnât sound interestingâsheâd enjoyed hearing Saulâs stories about himâbut rather because of a wariness about getting drawn into his life, into someone elseâs grief.
To Renaâs relief, Morton abruptly shifts gears, turning his inquiry to Leonardâs demographics: age, address, occupation, legal history. At occupation, he raises an eyebrow. âTwo shrinks?â
âWell, not really. I havenât seen patients since 1955. I taught the history of psychiatry to medical students and residents. I retired two years ago.â
âSo letâs hear your two cents on what might have happened here.â Leonard adds very little to what Rena has already said: he knew Saul had been having a hard time since the boy who threw himself in front of the train, theyâd been less in touch this past year, he guesses heâd placed too much stock in the good cheer Saul had shown at his birthday party.
Listening to Leonard, Renaâs fatigue surfacesâa dry burning around her eyes, her thoughts slow and muffled as though theyâve traveled down a long corridor to reach her mind. A sharp tone in Leonardâs voice jolts her back to alertness.
âIâd been hoping this would be a two-way exchange, that youâd tell us how Saul is, whatâs going to happen next, what we can do.â
Morton lowers his feet. He folds his hands and leans forward, a sequence so often repeated, she can see, itâs no longer deliberate. âLook, this is a complicated thing and Iâm going to talk to you two straight because youâre both educated people, not like some of the know-nothings I see in this office. The law says that what the client tells me belongs to the client and I canât reveal that to anyone, not even our creator above. But you know and I know that