Kateâs reminiscence (in 1917) of Emily at the Evergreens in 1859,âwith her dog, & Lantern! often at the piano playing weird & wonderful melodies, all from her own inspiration, oh! She was a choice spirit!â These âweird and wonderfulâ riffs do mirror the music of her poems, and we can see how Dickinson loved to improvise, but she remains a moving target, hard to find. âBiography first convinces us of the fleeing of the Biographiedââ she wrote to Higginson in 1885. [Letter 972]
I believe she suffered horrendously as a woman; dream brides drift in and out of her poems like a continual nightmareâyet she did not want to be âBridalled.â Sometimes she was married to God, with her âTitle divine,â sometimes to the Devil. Like Sue herself, she had a genuine fear of male sexuality, that infernal âman of noon,â who scorches and scalds every little virgin flowerââthey know that the man of noon, is mightier than the morning and their life is henceforth to him. Oh, Susie, it is dangerous, and it is all too dear, these simple trusting spirits, and the spirits mightier, which we cannot resist! It does rend me, Susie, the thought of it when it comes, that I tremble lest at sometime I, too, am yielded up.â [Letter 93, 1852]
She had a plan for Sue and herself, a lifetime of love and devotion to the one craft that was open to womenââwe are the only poets, and everyone else is prose .â Â Â Â Â [Letter 56, October 9, 1851] Together they might defeat or outfox âthe man of noon.â But Sue was an orphan in search of a home. She couldnât practice her craft in the poorhouse. And so she yielded herself up to Austin, this willful girl who seemed to have such a sway over Emily all her life. So many of Dickinsonâs poems and letters are like dream songs, where she had to borrow from Shakespeare to change her sex, morph into some Marc Antony trying to conquer that Cleopatra who lived next door. . . .
I believe that her rebellion against the culture of nineteenth-century Amherst was of another kind. She was promiscuous in her own fashion, deceiving everyone around her with the sly masks she wore. She was faithful to no one but her dog. Her white dress was one more bit of camouflage, to safeguard the witchery of her craft. It may have been an act of impersonation, as Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar suggest in The Madwoman in the Attic, but I donât agree that Dickinson, decked in white, becameâa helpless agoraphobic, trapped in her room in her fatherâs house.â Thereâs a different tale to tell.
She played the role of little girl that nineteenth-century women were meant to play. But she was far from a little girl, even if she told Higginson, âI have a little shapeâit would not crowd your Deskânor make much Racket as the Mouse, that dents your Galleriesââ [Letter 265] It was one more act of seduction. She must have sensed her own monstrous powersâthis Vesuvius at Home. The Brain, she would write, is wider than the Sky.
       The Brain is just the weight of Godâ
       ForâHeft themâPound for Poundâ
       And they will differâif they doâ
       As Syllable from Sound â     [Fr598]
She may have sent her letter-poems to favorite friends like little bombs of love, but I donât believe she ever meant to share her own âexperimentsâ with anyone else. Higginson was reluctant to unclasp her Portfolioâpoems plucked up from the roots of her mind. But she wasnât boasting when she saidâtwiceâthat he had saved her life, not because he had much to say about her poems. He didnât. But he cared for his half-cracked poetess, must have sniffed her greatness and her suffering. He wasnât a fool. He just